Re: [aspectj-users] "About AspectJ creation and After advice"

["Ramnivas Laddad" <ramnivas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For question 1: Why not use named pointcuts? Then, if you want, you can create one more named pointcut combining the 20 pointcuts and used it in perthis().

For question 2: There isn't a way to handle exception in plain after advice. Why do you want to do this?

-Ramnivas

On Nov 12, 2007 9:45 PM, Henrique Mostaert <henrique.mr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear AspectJ users,

   I have simple two questions about AspectJ.

•  About AspectJ creation (association), we have the "per-object association", which associates a separate aspect instance with the execution object
  (this) for the join point matching the pointcut specified inside perthis(). However, suppose we have an Aspect with twenty (20) anonymous pointcut.

          Question 1: Is there any way to perform the perthis() for this Aspect without explicit all the 20 anonymous pointcut inside the perthis()?

• About After advice, we have two more kinds of after advice besides the simpler one. One of them is the After throwing -- that is responsible to add behavior when the intercepted method throws an exception. We also can verify the kind of the exception thrown: after() throwing(Throwable throwable), by using thowable inside the advice's body.

            Question 2: I know the uses of after advice (after, after returning and after throwing). However, I really want If there exists any way to handler an exception (or verify the kind
                             of exception thrown) using a simple after advice (no using after throwing).


  Best regards!

--
Henrique Mostaert
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users