[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[aspectj-users] Re: No WEAVEINFO messages for cflow pointcuts!
|
Hi Andy,
Thank you for your quick response!
Sorry for being inaccurate: When using a cflow pointcut in an around
advice I run into the depicted problem.
My aspect is:
public aspect Aspect {
pointcut getA() : execution(String a.internal.A.getA());
pointcut getB() : execution(String b.internal.B.getB());
String around() : getB() && cflow(getA()) {
System.out.println("getB() && cflow(getA())");
return "Aspect";
}
}
In the if() statement the debugger sais: aKind.toString() -> "cflowEntry".
But CflowEntry AdviceKinds are not covered by the if() statement.
Regards,
Heiko
Andy Clement schrieb:
The if() statement you quote is talking about kinds of advice - but
your message talks about pointcuts???
That if() statement will allow for advice attached to cflow pointcuts
just fine:
public aspect A {
before(): cflow(call(* m2(..))) && withincode(* m(..)) { }
public void m() {m2();}
public void m2() {}
}
ajc -showWeaveInfo A.java
Join point 'method-call(void A.m2())' in Type 'A' (A.java:5) advised
by before advice from 'A' (A.java:3) [with runtime test]
On 11/06/07, Heiko Seeberger <heiko.seeberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I am using AJEER (http://ajeer.sourceforge.net/) which is a
load-time-weaving enabler for the eclipse Runtime. AJEER itself relies
on the AspectJ LTW API.
When using pointcuts with cflow(...) I run into serious trouble, because
AJEER relies on WEAVEINFO messages which seem only to be generated for
certain "interesting" pointcuts.
See org.aspectj.weaver.Shadow.reportWeavingMessage(...):
// Only report on interesting advice kinds ...
...
if (!( aKind.equals(AdviceKind.Before) ||
aKind.equals(AdviceKind.After) ||
aKind.equals(AdviceKind.AfterReturning) ||
aKind.equals(AdviceKind.AfterThrowing) ||
aKind.equals(AdviceKind.Around) ||
aKind.equals(AdviceKind.Softener))) return;
I kindly request help form the AJ gurus for that:
Why are cflow pointcuts not interesting?
Is there a chance to fix this?
Regards,
Heiko
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users