RE: [aspectj-users] One target for intertype declarations

[Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Pearce wrote:
> That's interesting.  So, is there any actual difference between
> using an ITD instead of pertarget?
ITDs cannot hold aspect instances since normally such instances
cannot be created by hand. Google for "association aspects" for a
different approach.

> Is the reference put into all objects
> matching the pertarget pointcut, or just into objects for which an
> aspect is created?   
Isn't that the same? One aspect instance is created for any object
matching the pertarget pointcut.

Eric

- -- 
Eric Bodden
Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
RWTH Aachen University

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQZ00gswiFCm7RlWCEQJMKACdEavVNVdD7d8Kc/11JBvoPsuUwZcAoJLp
+rpYtSIUvVVff+cVL7WwJjMo
=ZgIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----