Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ 1.1.1 is on its way... AspectJ 1.1.1rc1 is he

["George Harley1" <GHARLEY@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wes, 

Sure, I will send the modified sources to you off-line together with some other observations.

Best regards,
George
________________________________________
George C. Harley

Wes Isberg <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 28/08/2003 14:58 Please respond to aspectj-dev

To:        aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx         cc:                 Subject:        Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ 1.1.1 is on its way...  AspectJ 1.1.1rc1 is here

 > Maybe the fact that we have unit test cases whose success relies on 
being
 > run in a particular sequence is something we might want to address post
 > 1.1.1 ?

That would clearly be a test bug, but I'm not sure that's why the
TestingDriversModulesTests are failing.  I'll look into those.
Can you send me the source file with the ordering that works
for IBM JDK 1.3.1 for that test?

Thanks -
Wes


George Harley1 wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I spent a bit of time today doing some install and verification testing of 
> this release candidate on my Linux server. Everything seemed fine. 
> 
> On Windows I ran the JUnit and harness tests against the rc on the latest 
> level IBM 131 and 141 JVMs. On the IBM 141 everything passed 100% while on 
> the IBM 131 there were a grand total of three JUnit test failures. These 
> were :-
> 
> AjdeModuleTests (1 failure)
> -----------------------------------------
> testCompileOutput : failure : expected class 
> testdata\AspectJBuildManagerTest\bin\figures\Main.class
>  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected class 
> testdata\AspectJBuildManagerTest\bin\figures\Main.class
>                                        at 
> org.aspectj.ajde.internal.AspectJBuildManagerTest.testCompileOutput(AspectJBuildManagerTest.java:59)
> 
> 
> TestingDriversModuleTests (2 failures)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> testTitleListFileSelectionPluralFailOnly : failure : skips expected:<15> 
> but was:<16>
>  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: skips expected:<15> but was:<16>
>                                                                 at 
> org.aspectj.testing.drivers.HarnessSelectionTest.checkSelection(HarnessSelectionTest.java:346)
>                                                                 at 
> org.aspectj.testing.drivers.HarnessSelectionTest.testTitleListFileSelectionPluralFailOnly(HarnessSelectionTest.java:280)
> 
> 
> testTitleListFileSelectionPlural : failure : skips expected:<15> but 
> was:<16>
>  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: skips expected:<15> but was:<16>
>                                                                at 
> org.aspectj.testing.drivers.HarnessSelectionTest.checkSelection(HarnessSelectionTest.java:346)
>                                                                at 
> org.aspectj.testing.drivers.HarnessSelectionTest.testTitleListFileSelectionPlural(HarnessSelectionTest.java:269)
> 
> 
> As previously noticed, differences between the IBM 131 reflection 
> implementation and those found in the Sun 131, Sun 141 and IBM 141 JVMs 
> affects the order in which the JUnit tests get run and it looks like this 
> is again responsible for these failing cases (I understand that the IBM 
> reflection code has changed a lot between 131 and 141). By changing the 
> order in which the IBM 131 JVM runs the tests (just moving the methods 
> around the source files) the above "failing" tests can be made to pass. 
> Maybe the fact that we have unit test cases whose success relies on being 
> run in a particular sequence is something we might want to address post 
> 1.1.1 ?
> 
> Best regards,
> George
> ________________________________________
> George C. Harley
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Adrian Colyer/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> Sent by: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 26/08/2003 09:14
> Please respond to aspectj-dev
> 
>  
>         To:     ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        [aspectj-dev] AspectJ 1.1.1 is on its way...  AspectJ 1.1.1rc1 is here
> 
>  
> 
> We're planning to put out an AspectJ 1.1.1 release soon. To help us get 
> the
> quality of the release as high as possible, we have built a release
> candidate, 1.1.1rc1.
> 
> We appreciate your help in squashing any bugs in this release before
> 1.1.1.  If you find any bugs, please submit a reproducible test case to
> https://dev.eclipse.org (-> Bug Reports) (product AspectJ, component
> Compiler for compiler bugs).
> 
> You can access the download at
>   http://download.eclipse,org/technology/ajdt/aspectj-1.1.1rc1.jar.
> 
> There are the following known issues with this release:
> * the changes file has not been updated - this will be done by 1.1.1
> * there are 'half-a-dozen or so very minor broken docs links'  that can be
> repaired in time for 1.1.1
> 
> In addition:
> 
> A companion AJDT release (1.1.4) is available from the AJDT developer
> update
> site:
> 
>   http://download.eclipse.org/technology/ajdt/dev/update
> 
> There is the following known issue with this release of AJDT:
> * Building projects that use linked source folders, and contain non-java
> resource files causes an IOException when trying to copy the resources 
> into
> the output folder. We will fix this ASAP and post an AJDT refresh ahead of
> 1.1.1.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian, on behalf of The AspectJ Team
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
aspectj-dev mailing list
aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev