Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ/AJDT/Eclipse

[Wes Isberg <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Macneil Shonle wrote:
> 
> Hi Wes,
> 
> Thanks, that answers my questions!
> 
> So what CVS tree's do I need for ajc work?

See the FAQ
 
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/doc/faq.html#q:buildingsource

Wes

Macneil Shonle wrote:
> 
> Hi Wes,
> 
> Thanks, that answers my questions!
> 
> So what CVS tree's do I need for ajc work? (Ie. what trees are necessary and
> sufficient for building a standalone ajc? I'd rather not get all of the sources
> for eclipse, but if there is no choice then there is no choice.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Macneil
> 
> > > I'm a little confused over the story between
> > >
> > >   AspectJ,
> > >   AJDT, and
> > >   Eclipse.
> >
> > - Eclipse is a software platform.
> >
> > - JDT is an eclipse project to support Java development.
> >   JDT has a Java compiler.
> >
> > - AspectJ 1.1 is built on Eclipse/JDT's Java compiler
> >   but is distributed and can run standalone.
> >
> > - AJDT is an eclipse project to integrate AspectJ into Eclipse/JDT
> >   so you can use Eclipse to develop AspectJ programs.
> >
> > This is the right level of separation/integration.  AspectJ is
> > available standalone, and supports external projects doing IDE
> > integrations in Eclipse, Emacs, JBuilder, and NetBeans.
> >
> > > P.S. I only need the sources for ajc, but the aspectj-tools-src-1.0.6.tgz
> file's
> > > contents are very different than the CVS org.aspectj repository's contents.
> What
> > > is the definitive version?
> >
> > The 1.1 version of AspectJ is built on eclipse's Java compiler,
> > so the 1.0 and 1.1 sources are almost completely different.
> >
> > So the definitive version of 1.0 is in aspectj-tools-src-1.0.6.tgz, and
> > the definitive version of 1.1 is in the eclipse CVS tree.
> >
> > I hope that answers your questions.
> > Wes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev