| Re: [aspectj-dev] aspectj and jdk |
You're right. As with Generic Java, when Java changes, AspectJ should change accordingly, so pointcuts should be able to operate based on metadata, when that's available in Java. But that's a different proposition from AspectJ becoming part of Java. Wes Jim Z wrote: > > What about the metadata JSR that Gregor is working on (JSR 175)? Is that at > all related? > > >From: Wes Isberg <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Reply-To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > >To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] aspectj and jdk > >Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:36:09 -0800 > > > > > IS there any chance, aspectj will become part of JDK in future? > > > >It's possible, but I know of no discussions for putting in Java 1.5. > > > >For more information, watch the JSR's at http://www.jcp.org, > >and see the FAQ entry > > > >http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/doc/faq.html#q:standardization > > > >Wes > >_______________________________________________ > >aspectj-dev mailing list > >aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > >http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev > > _________________________________________________________________ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-dev mailing list > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev