|
Re: Support for some kind of sync in TM [message #30779 is a reply to message #30673] |
Mon, 12 January 2009 13:09 |
Martin Oberhuber Messages: 1007 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello sNOP,
integration of RSE with Platform Team/Synchronization has already been
implemented by a Student for the Google Summer of Code programme this
year, and it's just about to be integrated into the RSE codebase:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=185925
it will be in with RSE 3.1m5.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
sNop wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> I want to ask you one question, is planned some kink of
> synchronization in feature ?
>
> Because there is only one option and it's "Overwrite existing resources without warnings",
> sync would be great feature
>
> thank you for reactions
|
|
|
|
Re: Support for some kind of sync in TM [message #578405 is a reply to message #30673] |
Mon, 12 January 2009 13:09 |
Martin Oberhuber Messages: 1007 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello sNOP,
integration of RSE with Platform Team/Synchronization has already been
implemented by a Student for the Google Summer of Code programme this
year, and it's just about to be integrated into the RSE codebase:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=185925
it will be in with RSE 3.1m5.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
sNop wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> I want to ask you one question, is planned some kink of
> synchronization in feature ?
>
> Because there is only one option and it's "Overwrite existing resources without warnings",
> sync would be great feature
>
> thank you for reactions
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04361 seconds