|
Re: Hudson 3.1.2: Error in cascading job workflow control? [message #1308154 is a reply to message #1299844] |
Tue, 22 April 2014 00:44 |
Winston Prakash Messages: 534 Registered: August 2011 Location: Fremont, CA USA |
Senior Member |
|
|
Based on what you explained above, theoretically building ProdX multiple times seems correct to me.
You wrote "ProdX need B and some parts of D and E" (So, I'm assuming ProdX must be declaring B, D, E as dependencies)
Also you wrote you have the setting "Build when Maven dependencies have been updated by Maven 3 integration"
Because of the above criteria, since B, D, E are declared as dependencies in prodX, it will build whenever B, D, E are built.
Is that not correct?
Winston Prakash
Eclipse Hudson team
|
|
|
Re: Hudson 3.1.2: Error in cascading job workflow control? [message #1327604 is a reply to message #1308154] |
Fri, 02 May 2014 08:38 |
Denis Schettl Messages: 23 Registered: December 2013 Location: Schwalbach, Germany |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi Winstone,
sorry for the long delay, but I was on vacation.
Now back to your answere ... Yes you are right, but only if you have only activated the "Build block, as long as downstream project is built". The downstream build control seems to work, but I have for all jobs also the "Build block, as long as upstream project is built" activaed and this option seems to be ignored.
I can see that after B was build, C and D was in the build queue (with all the other projects that have dependencies to B + C + D). They starts to Build and after some time my job C was building ... And again all the other jobs are now again in the build queue ... If I go with my mousepointer over the jobs in the queue, i can see "Downstream job xxx is already building", but never "Upstream job xxx is already building" ...
With both options activated (do not build while upstream or downstream jobs are running) there is only on correct build possible
B -> C -> D -> E -> ProdX
Or do I have misunderstand the kind of working of the two options?
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04458 seconds