| Re: [buckminster-dev] question about multiple versions of bundles [message #1287499] |
Mon, 07 April 2014 21:21 |
 Scott Lewis
Messages: 1038
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Another data point on this.
Using java8+ the java8-enabled version of Eclipse 4.4 (i.e. I20140318)
using PDE I was able to build the feature that I provide the fragment
for below...i.e. that has two versions (1.0.0 and 2.0.0) of asyncproxy
bundle. The built feature does have both versions of asyncproxy present
in the target repo.
Thanks for any ideas.
Scott
On 4/6/2014 10:39 AM, Scott Lewis wrote:
> Hi Buckminster dev community,
>
> We/ECF [1] are/have been happily using Buckminster for years
> now...thank you all kindly for that BTW...it's much appreciated.
>
> ECF has recently added some support for using Java8's
> CompletableFuture with our 'asynchronous remote service proxy' feature
> [2]. Here's a description of the usefulness of the feature [3], and
> here's the bug/enhancement for it [4].
>
> We are trying to now use buckminster to build two versions (1.0.0) and
> (2.0.0) of a new bundle...with bundle symbolic id:
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy. The 1.0.0 version does not
> have Java8 dependencies...and so should be built with something < j8,
> the 2.0.0 does have J8 dependencies and so should use java8
> compiler+class libs.
>
> We previously were/are using buckminster...with all the necessary
> cquery/mspec, etc...to build the 1.0.0 version with java6
> compiler...everything fine when this is what's in the feature:
>
> <plugin
> id="org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy"
> download-size="0"
> install-size="0"
> version="0.0.0"
> unpack="false"/>
>
> Now...we've added both of the 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 bundles to the relevant
> feature...and it looks like this:
>
> <plugin
> id="org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy"
> download-size="0"
> install-size="0"
> version="1.0.0.qualifier"
> unpack="false"/>
>
> <plugin
> id="org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy"
> download-size="0"
> install-size="0"
> version="2.0.0.qualifier"
> unpack="false"/>
>
> We've also installed (via installJRE buckminster command) the java8
> JRE for the build.
>
> However, when we try to build the feature with latest version of
> buckminster (recently updated), with both the 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 versions
> of the bundle in the feature we get this error:
>
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy:osgi.bundle/[2.0.0,2.0.1):
> Rejecting provider
> p2({0}?importType=binary[http://download.ecf-project.org/repo/?importType=binary]):
> No component match was found
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy:osgi.bundle/[2.0.0,2.0.1): No
> provider was found that could resolve the request
> ERROR [0029] : No suitable provider for component
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy:osgi.bundle/[2.0.0,2.0.1) was
> found in resourceMap
> file:/opt/hudson/jobs/C-HEAD-sdk.feature/workspace/ecf.rmap
> ERROR [0029] : No suitable provider for component
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy:osgi.bundle/[2.0.0,2.0.1) was
> found in searchPath org.eclipse.ecf
> ERROR [0029] : Version 1.0.0.qualifier rejected: Not designated
> by [2.0.0,2.0.1)
> ERROR [0029] : Rejecting provider
> p2({0}?importType=binary[http://download.ecf-project.org/repo/?importType=binary]):
> No component match was found
> INFO: TAG-ID 0029 = Query for org.eclipse.ecf.sdk:eclipse.feature,
> path: org.eclipse.ecf.sdk:eclipse.feature$3.8.1.qualifier ->
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.sdk.feature:eclipse.feature$3.8.1.qualifier
> -> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.feature:eclipse.feature$2.1.0.qualifier
>
>
> It looks (to me) as though the project that contains the 2.0.0 version
> of this bundle is not being found...but it...like the 1.0.0 version is
> in the mspec/rmap...because the 1.0.0 version of the bundle is found
> just fine.
>
> The projects that contain the 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 version respectively are
> in the same directory and have these as project names:
>
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy (1.0.0)
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.asyncproxy.j8 (2.0.0)
>
> I was thinking that perhaps we needed to add something special to the
> buckminster metadata to be able to have the 2.0.0 version be found
> with this project name...but I don't know what it is (if anything is
> needed).
>
> What would be the best way to handle this. Thanksinadvance for any
> advice.
>
> Scott
>
> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/ecf
> [2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/ECF/Asynchronous_Remote_Services
> [3] http://eclipseecf.blogspot.com/
> [4] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=431756
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03155 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
