| "Fold empty packages" doesn't work with CVS enabled? [message #179553] |
Mon, 27 September 2004 15:19  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ericyilin.yahoo.com
The "Fold empty packages in hierarchical Package Explorer layout"
option under Preferences->Java->Appearance doesn't seem to work for
projects under CVS control. Is this due to the CVS/ directories inside
the "empty" packages? If so, how do I make the Package Explorer ignore
CVS/ directories and treat packages containing only CVS/ and other
package directories as empty packages?
I am using Eclipse 3.0 on Mac OS 10.3.5.
Thanks,
Eric
|
|
|
| Re: "Fold empty packages" doesn't work with CVS enabled? [message #179601 is a reply to message #179553] |
Mon, 27 September 2004 18:04  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eclipse.rizzoweb.com
eric wrote:
> The "Fold empty packages in hierarchical Package Explorer layout" option
> under Preferences->Java->Appearance doesn't seem to work for projects
> under CVS control. Is this due to the CVS/ directories inside the
> "empty" packages? If so, how do I make the Package Explorer ignore CVS/
> directories and treat packages containing only CVS/ and other package
> directories as empty packages?
>
> I am using Eclipse 3.0 on Mac OS 10.3.5.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
One option open to you is to use the Java Browsing perspective instead
of the Java perspective (and Package Explorer). I find JB to be
superior, especially in the way it presents packages, types, and members
in separate panels/views.
HTH,
Eric
|
|
|
| Re: "Fold empty packages" doesn't work with CVS enabled? [message #179663 is a reply to message #179601] |
Tue, 28 September 2004 00:38 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ericyilin.yahoo.com
On 2004-09-28 02:04:21 +0800, Eric Rizzo <eclipse@rizzoweb.com> said:
> One option open to you is to use the Java Browsing perspective instead
> of the Java perspective (and Package Explorer). I find JB to be
> superior, especially in the way it presents packages, types, and
> members in separate panels/views.
But Java Browsing perspective still does not fold empty parent folders
the way I expected. All I want is for the package com.domain.app to
display as one entry: "com.domain.app" rather than:
+ com
+ domain
+ app
Agreed, JB -- as much as I despise it -- does seem to be superior at
this. But i'm sure Eclipse would catch up soon.
TIA,
Eric
|
|
|
|
| Re: "Fold empty packages" doesn't work with CVS enabled? [message #179789 is a reply to message #179739] |
Tue, 28 September 2004 11:50 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ericyilin.yahoo.com
> That option only collapses empty parent packages when the Package
> Explorer is in hierarchical layout (see PE's view menu, the black arrow
> in the view's toolbar).
>
> You should not see CVS folders in the Package Explorer - if you do, try
> checking out the project afresh.
>
> To filter empty (parent) packages, enable the two corresponding filters
> in the Package Explorer (view menu > Filters...).
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
Thanks for the response. However I figured out what the problem was.
Mac OS X leaves hidden resource files in folders called .DS_Store,
which Eclipse doesn't ignore like it does CVS. Once I weed out the
..DS_Store files, package name folding works as it should.
Maybe I should submit a bug report for this... Eclipse should, by
default, ignore .DS_Store (as well as other resource files) that Mac OS
X store inside folders.
Best,
ERic
|
|
|
| Re: "Fold empty packages" doesn't work with CVS enabled? [message #179830 is a reply to message #179663] |
Tue, 28 September 2004 14:19 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eclipse.rizzoweb.com
eric wrote:
> On 2004-09-28 02:04:21 +0800, Eric Rizzo <eclipse@rizzoweb.com> said:
>
>> One option open to you is to use the Java Browsing perspective instead
>> of the Java perspective (and Package Explorer). I find JB to be
>> superior, especially in the way it presents packages, types, and
>> members in separate panels/views.
>
>
> But Java Browsing perspective still does not fold empty parent folders
> the way I expected. All I want is for the package com.domain.app to
> display as one entry: "com.domain.app" rather than:
>
> + com
> + domain
> + app
You can switch Java Browsing (Packages view) to a flat layout instead of
a hierarchal layout - that should give what you want (it's the way I
prefer it, too).
> Agreed, JB -- as much as I despise it -- does seem to be superior at
> this. But i'm sure Eclipse would catch up soon.
Heh - by "JB" I meant Java Browsing, not JBuilder. After I saw the
message posted I was afraid someone might mis-interpret it. I never
found anything about JBlunder that I liked, certainly not the way it
presents code organization.
Eric
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03736 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
