Eclipse Community Forums: TMF (Xtext) » Confusion about completion proposals

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » TMF (Xtext) » Confusion about completion proposals(suggesting function parameters)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Confusion about completion proposals [message #1036234]

Mon, 08 April 2013 05:36

Steve Kallestad

Messages: 62
Registered: March 2013

Member

In java, when I select a template from the completion proposal list, it shows a little yellow box with a list of local variables that I might want to pass into a given function.

I've customized my ProposalProvider (MyDSL_ProposalProvider extends AbstractMyDSL_ProposalProvider) and I'm getting the right proposals, but they don't appear unless I CTRL+Space to bring it up.

I'm wondering if there's a different proposal provider that I should be working with or if there's a way to automatically bring up the proposal list as I tab through templated parameters similar to what happens with Java in eclipse.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1036251 is a reply to message #1036234]

Mon, 08 April 2013 06:12

Alexander Nittka

Messages: 1193
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi,

have a look at the documentation. There is a section on template proposals and template variable resolution. If you want the proposals for references to be shown automatically you have to use the "Cross Reference Template Variable".

Alex

Need training, onsite consulting or any other kind of help for Xtext?
Go visit http://xtext.itemis.com or send a mail to xtext@itemis.de

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1036279 is a reply to message #1036251]

Mon, 08 April 2013 07:12

Steve Kallestad

Messages: 62
Registered: March 2013

Member

Perfect! I found a couple of relevant web pages - itemis and Karsten's blog that talk about custom template variable resolvers.

For some reason, the cross-reference resolver isn't working the way I had hoped - probably a scoping issue because of the way I have things defined, but rather than chase it down and try to override it, I think it'll be best to build a new resolver and leave the default functionality in place just in case I end up needing it down the road.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1036801 is a reply to message #1036279]

Mon, 08 April 2013 20:49

Steve Kallestad

Messages: 62
Registered: March 2013

Member

I'm seeing a couple of problems, correct me if I'm wrong:

1) It looks like the first proposal that the variable resolver produces always replaces the text of the variable within the template. (so if your template includes ${MyDescriptiveName:MyTemplateVariable}, MyDescriptiveName disappears before it's displayed to the end user.)

I got around it for now by including the named variable as the first entry in the list, but that doesn't seem ideal to me.

2) Also, the templateVariableResolver.resolveValues() uses a flat arraylist of strings, so if you want your proposals to display one way and produce a formatted result (e.g. surrounded with quotes) that's not a possibility.

and

3) there's no way of associating an icon with a suggestion.

====
I looked around for information that covered these things but came up dry. I can live with things the way they are - none are *really* problems, just nice to haves. I mention them only to double-check that I *once-again* didn't miss something obvious or clearly documented.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1036819 is a reply to message #1036801]

Mon, 08 April 2013 21:29

Christian Dietrich

Messages: 13359
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi for 2 and 3 you could try to customize templateproposal.apply and
give the positionbasedconpletionporoposal stuff like an image and a
display string

--
Need training, onsite consulting or any other kind of help for Xtext?
Go visit http://xtext.itemis.com or send a mail to xtext at itemis dot de

Need professional support for Xtext, Xpand, EMF?
Go to: https://www.itemis.com/en/xtext/
Twitter : @chrdietrich
Blog : https://www.dietrich-it.de

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1036877 is a reply to message #1036819]

Mon, 08 April 2013 23:36

Steve Kallestad

Messages: 62
Registered: March 2013

Member

Christian - I'm not quite following.

I get the templateproposal.apply, but I don't see where the TemplateVariableResolver actually connects to the TemplateProposal class.

My question is this:

Let's say I want to customize templateproposal.apply - how do I bind that customization so so that it works on the suggestions given by my TemplateVariableResolver?

I tried connecting it to the TemplateProposal by overriding doCreateProposal in my TemplateProposalProvider, but that only gets triggered when the outer template is selected, not on the suggestions from the TemplateVariableResolver.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1037029 is a reply to message #1036877]

Tue, 09 April 2013 05:13

Christian Dietrich

Messages: 13359
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Sorry if my answer was missleading- it was just a digging hint - of
course you have to solve these things yourself. When I debug I have a
xtexttemplateproposal in my hand. - you should be able to subclass
it. How to connect the template vars to the metadata - no idea - you
have to digg yourself

--
Need training, onsite consulting or any other kind of help for Xtext?
Go visit http://xtext.itemis.com or send a mail to xtext at itemis dot de

Need professional support for Xtext, Xpand, EMF?
Go to: https://www.itemis.com/en/xtext/
Twitter : @chrdietrich
Blog : https://www.dietrich-it.de

Report message to a moderator

Re: Confusion about completion proposals [message #1037333 is a reply to message #1037029]

Tue, 09 April 2013 12:32

Steve Kallestad

Messages: 62
Registered: March 2013

Member

Thanks again Christian.

I got to digging. This was a difficult task, but in the end I'm happy that I got through it.

JFace's content assist functionality does *NOT* like to be subclassed.

In the end, I decided that it would just be better if the regular content-assist showed up. It wasn't an easy task and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone, but the hooks are in the LinkedModeUI previous and next functions.

Unfortunately getting to those functions is a giant pain and it requires re-building a lot of code from jface because there are a lot of private classes and variables that need to be coordinated.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	The code for the static initializer is exceeding the 65535 bytes limit
Next Topic:	Is it possible to view the ".dmodel" file in a graphical view like UML?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sat Feb 22 17:09:35 GMT 2020

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter