|
Re: Inconsistencies between ".di"file and ".uml"file [message #987031 is a reply to message #987025] |
Fri, 23 November 2012 03:48 |
|
Hi,
You are probably deleting only the *view* of the element from the
diagram. To delete the element from the model also is a different
operation. By default, the Delete key deletes only the view.
Right-click on the element in the diagram to find an action to delete
the element from the model.
What do you mean by generating the *.di file from the *.uml file? It
isn't a generated file. It has entirely its own data, with only
references to the diagrams in the *.notation file. This latter is what
references the elements in the *.uml file.
HTH,
Christian
On 2012-11-23 02:58:29 +0000, Beatus Ding said:
> My papyrus is 0.9.1,when I delete something,like one class,in the class
> diagram and save the ".di" file,but the ".uml" file remain the deleted
> element.I reopen the ".uml" file,it remain the deleted element as
> before.What's wrong?Is it a bug?By the way, how can I generate the
> ".di" file from ".uml" file?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Inconsistencies between ".di"file and ".uml" [message #987100 is a reply to message #987064] |
Fri, 23 November 2012 13:21 |
|
Hi,
The diagrams are all in the *.notation file, not the *.di file.
You can recover the *.di file from the workspace's local history.
Right-click on the folder that contained the *.di file and select the
"Restore from Local History..." action.
HTH,
Christian
On 2012-11-23 09:21:24 +0000, Beatus Ding said:
> I copy the content of the ".uml" file to a text file,and I delete the
> ".di" file carelessly.So I wonder if I can recover the graphical model
> from the content of the ".uml" file.
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04095 seconds