|
Re: Metamodel of ETL [message #903022 is a reply to message #903016] |
Tue, 21 August 2012 16:35 |
|
Hi Fabian,
Thanks for your message. As you have correctly observed by browsing through the source code, ETL is not underpinned by an EMF metamodel. We're in the process of implementing metamodels for all Epsilon languages which will enable features such as static type checking and analysis, code completion etc. but I'm afraid I can't commit to a release date at this point.
Cheers,
Dimitris
|
|
|
Re: Metamodel of ETL [message #903135 is a reply to message #903022] |
Wed, 22 August 2012 07:46 |
|
Dimitris,
Is this implementation based on moving the Epsilon editors to xtext or the current architecture makes that inviable? Just wondering where a hand or two can be laid.
Regards,
Horacio Hoyos Rodriguez
Kinori Tech
Need professional support for Epsilon, EMF?
Go to: https://kinori.tech
|
|
|
Re: Metamodel of ETL [message #903169 is a reply to message #903135] |
Wed, 22 August 2012 11:28 |
|
Hi Horacio,
The plan is to do the transition in 2 steps. In the first step, we're creating metamodels for all Epsilon languages and switching the execution engine from using ASTs to using model elements. Once the execution engines are completely independent of ANTLR, we'll be moving on to develop Xtext/EMFText-based editors.
Cheers,
Dimitris
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02756 seconds