Home » Modeling » EMF "Technology" (Ecore Tools, EMFatic, etc) » [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around
[EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #106903] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 02:53 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: irbull.cs.uvic.ca
Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I know
that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I have
read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha works. Is
this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on sourceforge, etc...).
I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something like
the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
cheers,
ian
|
|
|
Re: [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #106986 is a reply to message #106903] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 11:25 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000504000408040103090904
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ian,
Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:
<http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842>
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842
http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/
<http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/>
The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have you
tried it lately?
Ian Bull wrote:
> Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I
> know that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I
> have read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha
> works. Is this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on
> sourceforge, etc...).
>
> I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
> Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
> sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something
> like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
>
> cheers,
> ian
--------------000504000408040103090904
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ian,<br>
<br>
Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:<a
href="http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842"><br>
</a>
<blockquote><a
href="http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842">http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842</a><br>
<a href="http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/">http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/</a><br>
</blockquote>
The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have you
tried it lately?<br>
<br>
<br>
Ian Bull wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:fmjrj2$i9u$1@build.eclipse.org" type="cite">Does
anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I know that
it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I have read,
it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha works. Is this
newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on sourceforge, etc...).
<br>
<br>
I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something
like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
<br>
<br>
cheers,
<br>
ian
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000504000408040103090904--
|
|
|
Re: [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #107115 is a reply to message #106986] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 18:25 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: irbull.cs.uvic.ca
Cool, I will keep an eye out for the code drop. As always, I'm sure you
and Nick will keep us informed of these great events that happen in the
modeling world :-)
As for ecore tools, I installed it and it looked exactly like the sample
GMF Ecore editor (with just a different file extension), which is a nice
enough editor. Then just yesterday I stumbled upon Topcased on Plug-in
central which I installed, and this is one of the best Ecore editors I
have ever seen.
I am not sure if this is the future of ecore tools project or not, but
looking at the proposal it seems like it might be, which is very exciting!
Cheers,
Ian
Ed Merks wrote:
> Ian,
>
> Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
> completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:
> <http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842>
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842
> http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/
> <http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/>
>
> The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have you
> tried it lately?
>
>
> Ian Bull wrote:
>> Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I
>> know that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I
>> have read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha
>> works. Is this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on
>> sourceforge, etc...).
>>
>> I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
>> Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
>> sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something
>> like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
>>
>> cheers,
>> ian
>
|
|
|
Re: [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #107141 is a reply to message #107115] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 18:49 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Ian,
It's the same people working on the Ecore Tools project so I expect lots
of goodness! If only I had more time to help out...
Ian Bull wrote:
> Cool, I will keep an eye out for the code drop. As always, I'm sure
> you and Nick will keep us informed of these great events that happen
> in the modeling world :-)
>
> As for ecore tools, I installed it and it looked exactly like the
> sample GMF Ecore editor (with just a different file extension), which
> is a nice enough editor. Then just yesterday I stumbled upon Topcased
> on Plug-in central which I installed, and this is one of the best
> Ecore editors I have ever seen.
>
> I am not sure if this is the future of ecore tools project or not, but
> looking at the proposal it seems like it might be, which is very
> exciting!
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Ian,
>>
>> Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
>> completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:
>> <http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842>
>>
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842
>> http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/
>> <http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/>
>>
>> The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have
>> you tried it lately?
>>
>>
>> Ian Bull wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I
>>> know that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I
>>> have read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha
>>> works. Is this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on
>>> sourceforge, etc...).
>>>
>>> I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in
>>> an Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable,
>>> but I'm sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used
>>> something like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore
>>> serialization :-)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> ian
>>
|
|
|
Re: [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #613997 is a reply to message #106903] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 11:25 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33216 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000504000408040103090904
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ian,
Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:
<http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842>
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842
http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/
<http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/>
The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have you
tried it lately?
Ian Bull wrote:
> Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I
> know that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I
> have read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha
> works. Is this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on
> sourceforge, etc...).
>
> I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
> Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
> sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something
> like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
>
> cheers,
> ian
--------------000504000408040103090904
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ian,<br>
<br>
Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:<a
href="http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842"><br>
</a>
<blockquote><a
href="http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842">http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842</a><br>
<a href="http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/">http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/</a><br>
</blockquote>
The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have you
tried it lately?<br>
<br>
<br>
Ian Bull wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:fmjrj2$i9u$1@build.eclipse.org" type="cite">Does
anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I know that
it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I have read,
it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha works. Is this
newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on sourceforge, etc...).
<br>
<br>
I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something
like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
<br>
<br>
cheers,
<br>
ian
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000504000408040103090904--
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Re: [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #614006 is a reply to message #106986] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 18:25 |
Ian Bull Messages: 145 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Cool, I will keep an eye out for the code drop. As always, I'm sure you
and Nick will keep us informed of these great events that happen in the
modeling world :-)
As for ecore tools, I installed it and it looked exactly like the sample
GMF Ecore editor (with just a different file extension), which is a nice
enough editor. Then just yesterday I stumbled upon Topcased on Plug-in
central which I installed, and this is one of the best Ecore editors I
have ever seen.
I am not sure if this is the future of ecore tools project or not, but
looking at the proposal it seems like it might be, which is very exciting!
Cheers,
Ian
Ed Merks wrote:
> Ian,
>
> Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
> completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:
> <http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842>
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842
> http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/
> <http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/>
>
> The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have you
> tried it lately?
>
>
> Ian Bull wrote:
>> Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I
>> know that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I
>> have read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha
>> works. Is this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on
>> sourceforge, etc...).
>>
>> I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in an
>> Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable, but I'm
>> sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used something
>> like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore serialization :-)
>>
>> cheers,
>> ian
>
|
|
|
Re: [EMFATIC] Is the source or binaries around [message #614008 is a reply to message #107115] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 18:49 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33216 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Ian,
It's the same people working on the Ecore Tools project so I expect lots
of goodness! If only I had more time to help out...
Ian Bull wrote:
> Cool, I will keep an eye out for the code drop. As always, I'm sure
> you and Nick will keep us informed of these great events that happen
> in the modeling world :-)
>
> As for ecore tools, I installed it and it looked exactly like the
> sample GMF Ecore editor (with just a different file extension), which
> is a nice enough editor. Then just yesterday I stumbled upon Topcased
> on Plug-in central which I installed, and this is one of the best
> Ecore editors I have ever seen.
>
> I am not sure if this is the future of ecore tools project or not, but
> looking at the proposal it seems like it might be, which is very
> exciting!
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Ian,
>>
>> Miguel and Chris were still in the process of getting the IP review
>> completed to get the code into CVS, but it has been recently approved:
>> <http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842>
>>
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1842
>> http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~mi.garcia/
>> <http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/%7Emi.garcia/>
>>
>> The Ecore Tools diagram support is really quite nice now too. Have
>> you tried it lately?
>>
>>
>> Ian Bull wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if the new Emfatic tool is available anywhere? I
>>> know that it is currently in proposal stage, but judging from what I
>>> have read, it seems as if it has evolved since its days on Alpha
>>> works. Is this newer version stable? Is is available? (Even on
>>> sourceforge, etc...).
>>>
>>> I have a bunch of ecore models in my thesis that I am including in
>>> an Appendix. I realize that XML is theoretically human-readable,
>>> but I'm sure my committee would be much happier with me if I used
>>> something like the Emfatic syntax over the default ecore
>>> serialization :-)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> ian
>>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Sep 23 05:22:04 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09509 seconds
|