Eclipse Community Forums: ServerTools (WTP)

Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » WTP XML Editor Tab width

WTP XML Editor Tab width [message #98119]

Tue, 03 May 2005 17:05

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: uwe.cscc.de

Hello,

there are any plans to implement a different tab width than 4 spaces
in the WTP XML editor?

--
Uwe

Re: WTP XML Editor Tab width [message #99920 is a reply to message #98119]

Fri, 06 May 2005 03:05

Eclipse User

Uwe Guenther wrote:
> there are any plans to implement a different tab width than 4 spaces
> in the WTP XML editor?

The displayed tab width should be settable in
Preferences->General->Editors->Text Editors (at least in Eclipse
3.1M6). There's currently a bug about the WTP editors not
respecting this value, however:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=86514

--
- Nitin

Re: WTP XML Editor Tab width [message #101662 is a reply to message #99920]

Mon, 09 May 2005 14:41

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: uwe.cscc.de

Hello Nitin,

On Fri, 06 May 2005 03:05:57 -0400, Nitin Dahyabhai <nitind@us.ibm.com> =
=

wrote:
> The displayed tab width should be settable in =

> Preferences->General->Editors->Text Editors (at least in Eclipse =

> 3.1M6). There's currently a bug about the WTP editors not respecting =
=

> this value, however:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86514

thanks for pointing this out and thanks to David Williams to increase th=
e
priority from P3 to P2.

To David:

Does priority P2 mean, Bug-ID 86514 will e removed in WTP M5.

-- =

Uwe

Re: WTP XML Editor Tab width [message #101706 is a reply to message #101662]

Mon, 09 May 2005 16:30

Eclipse User

On Mon, 09 May 2005 14:41:43 -0400, Uwe Guenther <uwe@cscc.de> wrote:

>
> Does priority P2 mean, Bug-ID 86514 will e removed in WTP M5.
>

Technically P2 just means we consider it higher priority that P3 :)
but yes, that's the intent, to get it fixed by M5 (just not a promise).

Re: WTP XML Editor Tab width [message #102005 is a reply to message #101706]

Tue, 10 May 2005 13:56

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: uwe.cscc.de

Hello David,

see below.

On Mon, 09 May 2005 16:30:34 -0400, David Williams =

<david_williams@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Technically P2 just means we consider it higher priority that P3 :)
> but yes, that's the intent, to get it fixed by M5 (just not a promise)=
..

Thanks for your answer.

-- =

Uwe

Previous Topic:	NullPointerException
Next Topic:	XML schema viewer suggestion

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sat Nov 08 07:21:22 EST 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter