|
Re: Buckminster plans for Eclipse Juno (4.2) [message #805497 is a reply to message #804291] |
Thu, 23 February 2012 20:49 |
|
Hi Matthew,
We have every intention of making Buckminster available for Juno. Our plan is to ship in time for Juno M6.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
On 02/22/2012 01:42 PM, Matthew Webber wrote:
> I wonder whether the core Buckminster developers could let us know what their plans are for Buckminster support in the
> releases scheduled for June 2012 - Eclipse 4.2 Juno and Eclipse 3.8 (not sure if there's a name).
>
> Buckminster is not listed (at http://www.eclipse.org/projects/releases/releases.php?release=juno) as a participating in
> the 4.2 simultaneous release.
>
> In theory (if my understanding is correct) you are supposed to be able to run a 3.7 binary in 3.8 and 4.2, but that's
> just theory ...
>
> We love our Buckminster, and we'd like to know its available for when we do move on from 3.7!
>
> Thanks
>
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Buckminster plans for Eclipse Juno (4.2) [message #892430 is a reply to message #805497] |
Thu, 28 June 2012 08:16 |
|
Hi
any news?
Lore
On 02/23/2012 09:49 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> We have every intention of making Buckminster available for Juno. Our
> plan is to ship in time for Juno M6.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> On 02/22/2012 01:42 PM, Matthew Webber wrote:
>> I wonder whether the core Buckminster developers could let us know
>> what their plans are for Buckminster support in the
>> releases scheduled for June 2012 - Eclipse 4.2 Juno and Eclipse 3.8
>> (not sure if there's a name).
>>
>> Buckminster is not listed (at
>> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/releases/releases.php?release=juno) as
>> a participating in
>> the 4.2 simultaneous release.
>>
>> In theory (if my understanding is correct) you are supposed to be able
>> to run a 3.7 binary in 3.8 and 4.2, but that's
>> just theory ...
>>
>> We love our Buckminster, and we'd like to know its available for when
>> we do move on from 3.7!
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it
TDD Book: https://leanpub.com/tdd-buildautomation-ci
Xtext Book: https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/implementing-domain-specific-languages-xtext-and-xtend-second-edition
|
|
|
Re: Buckminster plans for Eclipse Juno (4.2) [message #892432 is a reply to message #892430] |
Thu, 28 June 2012 08:25 |
|
Hi Lorenzo,
You will find the latest Buckminster build for Juno (currently RC3) here:
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/buckminster/updates-4.2
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/buckminster/headless-4.2
A release that matches the final Juno release will follow shortly.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
On 06/28/2012 10:16 AM, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> Hi
>
> any news?
>
> Lore
>
> On 02/23/2012 09:49 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> We have every intention of making Buckminster available for Juno. Our
>> plan is to ship in time for Juno M6.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas Hallgren
>>
>>
>> On 02/22/2012 01:42 PM, Matthew Webber wrote:
>>> I wonder whether the core Buckminster developers could let us know
>>> what their plans are for Buckminster support in the
>>> releases scheduled for June 2012 - Eclipse 4.2 Juno and Eclipse 3.8
>>> (not sure if there's a name).
>>>
>>> Buckminster is not listed (at
>>> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/releases/releases.php?release=juno) as
>>> a participating in
>>> the 4.2 simultaneous release.
>>>
>>> In theory (if my understanding is correct) you are supposed to be able
>>> to run a 3.7 binary in 3.8 and 4.2, but that's
>>> just theory ...
>>>
>>> We love our Buckminster, and we'd like to know its available for when
>>> we do move on from 3.7!
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03408 seconds