|
| Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #73804 is a reply to message #73786] |
Mon, 23 June 2008 11:12   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bruno.maehdros.com
Hi,
I'd vote for this too, that's actually the reason why I stay with 1.0.x,
because keeping up to date manually isn't the best way to keep a
functionnal installation.
Bruno
Стоян Димитров wrote:
> Hi *,
> I was wondering is there an interest in setting up an update site for
> the PDT 1.1 integration builds, or it is just me?
|
|
|
|
| Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #73893 is a reply to message #73821] |
Mon, 23 June 2008 21:12 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: stoyan.dimitrov.homelan.bg
Thanks! Looking forward to see it online!
Nick Boldt wrote:
> You might want to add yourself to the cc: list for this bug:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=233744#c15
>
> Bruno Mairlot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd vote for this too, that's actually the reason why I stay with
>> 1.0.x, because keeping up to date manually isn't the best way to keep
>> a functionnal installation.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>> Стоян Димитров wrote:
>>> Hi *,
>>> I was wondering is there an interest in setting up an update site for
>>> the PDT 1.1 integration builds, or it is just me?
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74104 is a reply to message #74086] |
Fri, 27 June 2008 21:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com
You mean an update site in a zip? Is that more useful than an update
site online? (p2 gives you multithreaded downloading so you can pull
from multiple mirrors at the same time. It's faster to do an install
this way than by downloading a zip. However, if you plan to roll out the
same install many times, you might prefer a one-time download you can
distribute. If that's the case, add such a request to the bug; my update
site builder system already creates these archived update sites, but
doesn't (yet) publish them as there's been no request for them... until
now. :)
That said, my system is not yet hooked up for PDT builds, so bear with
us while I help the PDT guys port their build system over.
Glen wrote:
> I have voted for that bug. So there are no plans for archived sites?
>
--
Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: using PDT 1.1 with Eclipse web site projects [message #74263 is a reply to message #74245] |
Mon, 30 June 2008 15:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: stoyan.amexy.com
Hi there,
i tried on few installs and the 'Go to definition' functionality was not
working at all, but this list is may not be a place for a discussion
like this.
Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone been able to use PDT 1.1 with Eclipse 3.4 to work
> with Eclipse web site projects? Those are from
> @dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/org.eclipse
>
> I've been able to see syntax highlighting for those, but php
> completion is not working for functions declared in project
> templates/includes, such as Phoenix. So, it is bit awkward to install
> ~30Mb worth of plugins just for syntax highlighting.
>
> It would be nice to componentize PDT features, so it would be
> possible to install just the editor without debugging support and
> reduce the IDE footprint. Though it seem like major dependencies are
> in DLTK core which is also not broken down to smaller features.
>
> regards,
> Eugene
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02875 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
