Eclipse Community Forums: PHP Development Tools (PDT) » PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site

Home » Language IDEs » PHP Development Tools (PDT) » PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site

PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #73786]

Mon, 23 June 2008 03:54

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: stoyan.amexy.com

Hi *,
I was wondering is there an interest in setting up an update site for
the PDT 1.1 integration builds, or it is just me?

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #73804 is a reply to message #73786]

Mon, 23 June 2008 07:12

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: bruno.maehdros.com

Hi,

I'd vote for this too, that's actually the reason why I stay with 1.0.x,
because keeping up to date manually isn't the best way to keep a
functionnal installation.

Bruno

Стоян Димитров wrote:
> Hi *,
> I was wondering is there an interest in setting up an update site for
> the PDT 1.1 integration builds, or it is just me?

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #73821 is a reply to message #73804]

Mon, 23 June 2008 10:36

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com

You might want to add yourself to the cc: list for this bug:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=233744#c15

Bruno Mairlot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd vote for this too, that's actually the reason why I stay with 1.0.x,
> because keeping up to date manually isn't the best way to keep a
> functionnal installation.
>
> Bruno
>
> Стоян Димитров wrote:
>> Hi *,
>> I was wondering is there an interest in setting up an update site for
>> the PDT 1.1 integration builds, or it is just me?

--
Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #73893 is a reply to message #73821]

Mon, 23 June 2008 17:12

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: stoyan.dimitrov.homelan.bg

Thanks! Looking forward to see it online!

Nick Boldt wrote:
> You might want to add yourself to the cc: list for this bug:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=233744#c15
>
> Bruno Mairlot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd vote for this too, that's actually the reason why I stay with
>> 1.0.x, because keeping up to date manually isn't the best way to keep
>> a functionnal installation.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>> Стоян Димитров wrote:
>>> Hi *,
>>> I was wondering is there an interest in setting up an update site for
>>> the PDT 1.1 integration builds, or it is just me?
>

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74018 is a reply to message #73821]

Fri, 27 June 2008 12:57

Eclipse User

Hi Nick,

Do you know if there is an archived site for 1.1 builds?

Glen.

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74068 is a reply to message #74018]

Fri, 27 June 2008 15:34

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com

Archived site? No. Update site? Not yet.

Add yourself to bug 233744 to track this request.

Glen wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Do you know if there is an archived site for 1.1 builds?
>
> Glen.
>

--
Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74086 is a reply to message #74068]

Fri, 27 June 2008 15:46

Eclipse User

I have voted for that bug. So there are no plans for archived sites?

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74104 is a reply to message #74086]

Fri, 27 June 2008 17:04

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com

You mean an update site in a zip? Is that more useful than an update
site online? (p2 gives you multithreaded downloading so you can pull
from multiple mirrors at the same time. It's faster to do an install
this way than by downloading a zip. However, if you plan to roll out the
same install many times, you might prefer a one-time download you can
distribute. If that's the case, add such a request to the bug; my update
site builder system already creates these archived update sites, but
doesn't (yet) publish them as there's been no request for them... until
now. :)

That said, my system is not yet hooked up for PDT builds, so bear with
us while I help the PDT guys port their build system over.

Glen wrote:
> I have voted for that bug. So there are no plans for archived sites?
>

--
Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74140 is a reply to message #74104]

Sat, 28 June 2008 08:38

Eclipse User

Nick,

If I use update sites, I don't have a file that I can back up for future
use.

My comment in the following bug explains things a little more clearly
(hopefully):

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=107510#c4

Regards,

Glen.

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74229 is a reply to message #74140]

Mon, 30 June 2008 01:50

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: stoyan.dimitrov.homelan.bg

Hi,
I do not know how related is this you your demands, but you may be
interested in Pulse plugin (<http://www.poweredbypulse.com/>)

Glen wrote:
> Nick,
>
> If I use update sites, I don't have a file that I can back up for future
> use.
>
> My comment in the following bug explains things a little more clearly
> (hopefully):
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=107510#c4
>
> Regards,
>
> Glen.
>

--
Stoyan

using PDT 1.1 with Eclipse web site projects [message #74245 is a reply to message #74104]

Mon, 30 June 2008 10:49

Eclipse User

I wonder if anyone been able to use PDT 1.1 with Eclipse 3.4 to work
with Eclipse web site projects? Those are from
@dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/org.eclipse

I've been able to see syntax highlighting for those, but php
completion is not working for functions declared in project
templates/includes, such as Phoenix. So, it is bit awkward to install
~30Mb worth of plugins just for syntax highlighting.

It would be nice to componentize PDT features, so it would be possible
to install just the editor without debugging support and reduce the IDE
footprint. Though it seem like major dependencies are in DLTK core which
is also not broken down to smaller features.

regards,
Eugene

Re: using PDT 1.1 with Eclipse web site projects [message #74263 is a reply to message #74245]

Mon, 30 June 2008 11:45

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: stoyan.amexy.com

Hi there,
i tried on few installs and the 'Go to definition' functionality was not
working at all, but this list is may not be a place for a discussion
like this.

Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone been able to use PDT 1.1 with Eclipse 3.4 to work
> with Eclipse web site projects? Those are from
> @dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/org.eclipse
>
> I've been able to see syntax highlighting for those, but php
> completion is not working for functions declared in project
> templates/includes, such as Phoenix. So, it is bit awkward to install
> ~30Mb worth of plugins just for syntax highlighting.
>
> It would be nice to componentize PDT features, so it would be
> possible to install just the editor without debugging support and
> reduce the IDE footprint. Though it seem like major dependencies are
> in DLTK core which is also not broken down to smaller features.
>
> regards,
> Eugene
>

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74315 is a reply to message #74229]

Mon, 30 June 2008 15:16

Eclipse User

Thanks Stoyan, I've heard about that before. I don't think it's really
what I'm looking for though.

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74693 is a reply to message #74140]

Wed, 02 July 2008 00:12

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com

In Eclipse 3.4, this is an Equinox.p2 problem, not Platform.Update, so
I've reassigned the bug and commented myself. I agree, this isn't a
great situation.

Glen wrote:
> Nick,
>
> If I use update sites, I don't have a file that I can back up for future
> use.
>
> My comment in the following bug explains things a little more clearly
> (hopefully):
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=107510#c4
>
> Regards,
>
> Glen.
>

--
Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb

Re: using PDT 1.1 with Eclipse web site projects [message #74727 is a reply to message #74263]

Wed, 02 July 2008 09:07

Eclipse User

You can find that bug here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/238364

Стоян Димитров schreef:
> Hi there,
> i tried on few installs and the 'Go to definition' functionality was not
> working at all, but this list is may not be a place for a discussion
> like this.
>
> Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if anyone been able to use PDT 1.1 with Eclipse 3.4 to work
>> with Eclipse web site projects? Those are from
>> @dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/org.eclipse
>>
>> I've been able to see syntax highlighting for those, but php
>> completion is not working for functions declared in project
>> templates/includes, such as Phoenix. So, it is bit awkward to install
>> ~30Mb worth of plugins just for syntax highlighting.
>>
>> It would be nice to componentize PDT features, so it would be
>> possible to install just the editor without debugging support and
>> reduce the IDE footprint. Though it seem like major dependencies are
>> in DLTK core which is also not broken down to smaller features.
>>
>> regards,
>> Eugene
>>

Re: PDT 1.1 Integration builds update site [message #74775 is a reply to message #74693]

Wed, 02 July 2008 14:29

Eclipse User

Thanks Nick.

Previous Topic:	DTDImpl errors when opening a file
Next Topic:	Find Function within PHP project

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sun Apr 27 13:30:07 EDT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter