|
Re: Double-byte characters not displayed in MS Word export [message #653225 is a reply to message #653000] |
Tue, 08 February 2011 21:38 |
|
Angela,
Have you looked for the Batang font on the AIX server in the paths
specified in the fonts config?
Jason
On 2/7/2011 4:48 PM, Angela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using BIRT 2.3.2 on AIX, certain character sets are not rendered
> correctly when the report is exported from the Web viewer to .doc
> format. The characters show correctly when exported to PDF or Excel, and
> the problem does not happen on Windows.
>
> For example, Korean characters in an export generated on AIX are
> converted to ???? and displayed in the Times font. However on Windows
> the characters display correctly and Batang is used.
>
> The default fontsConfig.xml file is in use. Can I solve this by
> configuring that file? Or do I need to install fonts on the server?
>
> Thanks,
> Angela
|
|
|
|
Re: Double-byte characters not displayed in MS Word export [message #654970 is a reply to message #654953] |
Thu, 17 February 2011 19:45 |
|
Is the font file compatible with AIX? Are you using any of the font
mapping in the fonts config file?
On 2/17/2011 1:00 PM, Angela wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. Batang was not on the AIX server. I believe
> it is a proprietary Microsoft font, but for testing purposes I copied
> batang.ttc to one of the default folder paths in the config file. This
> did not have any effect.
>
> In the XML source of the AIX-generated doc, the font is specified as
> Times: <w:rFonts w:ascii="Times" w:fareast="Times" w:h-ansi="Times"
> w:cs="Times"/>
>
> In the XML for the "successful" doc, the font for the Korean text has
> Unicode values rather than a specific font name:
> <w:rFonts w:ascii="바탕" w:fareast="바탕"
> w:h-ansi="바탕" w:cs="바탕"/>
>
> From this I wondered if it was up to the client to determine what font
> to use, and Word on my client was selecting Batang. I'm not sure if this
> makes sense. Do you know is there is a specific font requirement on the
> server for this to work correctly?
>
> Thanks,
> Angela
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03434 seconds