Home » Modeling » UML2 » More XSD -> EMF -> UML Issues
| More XSD -> EMF -> UML Issues [message #627531] |
Tue, 28 April 2009 20:13 |
 John T.E. Timm
Messages: 161
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Using the following library example schema:
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://www.example.eclipse.org/Library"
xmlns:ecore="http://www.eclipse.org/emf/2002/Ecore"
xmlns:lib="http://www.example.eclipse.org/Library"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="library" type="lib:Library"/>
<xsd:complexType name="Book">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="title" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="pages" type="xsd:int"/>
<xsd:element name="category" type="lib:BookCategory"/>
<xsd:element name="author" type="xsd:anyURI"
ecore:reference="lib:Writer" ecore:opposite="books"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="Writer">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="name" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="books"
type="xsd:anyURI" ecore:reference="lib:Book"
ecore:opposite="author"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="Library">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="name" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"
name="writers" type="lib:Writer"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"
name="books" type="lib:Book"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:simpleType name="BookCategory">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:NCName">
<xsd:enumeration value="Mystery"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="ScienceFiction"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="Biography"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:schema>
I import the above schema into EMF and then use the "Export Model..." to
generate create UML. In addition to issues previously mentioned (for which
I have submitted bug reports), I am running into a problem when I want to
go back to EMF from UML. Ideally, I would like to add OCL constraints to
the UML and then import back into EMF. This part seems to work fine. The
issue I am having is related to serializing to XML. Using the following
test code:
Writer author = LibraryFactory.eINSTANCE.createWriter();
author.setName("Some Author");
Book book = LibraryFactory.eINSTANCE.createBook();
book.setAuthor(author);
book.setCategory(BookCategory.SCIENCE_FICTION);
book.setTitle("Some Title");
book.setPages(100);
Library library = LibraryFactory.eINSTANCE.createLibrary();
library.setName("Some Library");
library.getWriters().add(author);
library.getBooks().add(book);
DocumentRoot root = LibraryFactory.eINSTANCE.createDocumentRoot();
root.setLibrary(library);
Resource.Factory factory = new LibraryResourceFactoryImpl();
XMLResource resource = (XMLResource)
factory.createResource(URI.createURI(LibraryPackage.eNS_URI) );
resource.getContents().add(root);
resource.save(System.out, null);
I get a NullPointerException, that I have tracked down to differences
between XSD->EMF and XSD->EMF->UML->EMF generated code. Specifically, in
LibraryPackageImpl.java, the following line:
// XSD->EMF generated code (WORKING):
initEReference(getDocumentRoot_Library(), this.getLibrary(), null,
"library", null, 0, -2, null, IS_TRANSIENT, IS_VOLATILE, IS_CHANGEABLE,
IS_COMPOSITE, !IS_RESOLVE_PROXIES, !IS_UNSETTABLE, IS_UNIQUE, IS_DERIVED,
IS_ORDERED);
// XSD->EMF->UML->EMF generated code (NOT WORKING):
initEReference(getDocumentRoot_Library(), this.getLibrary(), null,
"library", null, 0, 1, null, IS_TRANSIENT, IS_VOLATILE, IS_CHANGEABLE,
!IS_COMPOSITE, !IS_RESOLVE_PROXIES, !IS_UNSETTABLE, IS_UNIQUE, IS_DERIVED,
IS_ORDERED);
There differences are:
In the working ocde, the upperBound parameter is set to -2 (unspecified)
and the isContainment parameter is set to IS_COMPOSITE.
In the non-working code, the upperBound parameter is set to 1 and the
isContaintment parameter is set to !IS_COMPOSITE.
The upperBound parameter doesn't make a difference. However, if I change
!IS_COMPOSITE to IS_COMPOSITE in the non-working code, I no longer get a
null pointer exception. IS_COMPOSITE, should be true as the UML model
shows property "Aggregation" as "Composite" for the DocumentRoot.library
property. Not sure why it gets set the way it does. Any ideas?
Thanks,
JT
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 26 04:45:52 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03737 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
