Eclipse Community Forums: Plugin Development Environment (PDE) » Retrieving fully qualified names of method and field signatures.

Home » Eclipse Projects » Plugin Development Environment (PDE) » Retrieving fully qualified names of method and field signatures.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Retrieving fully qualified names of method and field signatures. [message #57146]

Mon, 20 April 2009 11:13

Tamas-Selicean Domitian

Messages: 10
Registered: July 2009

Junior Member

Hello all :)

I'm parsing a Java Project using the Java Model. I get to method and field
declarations and I have encountered a problem. Using the following methods:

IMethod#getSignature
IMethod#getExceptionTypes
IField#getTypeSignature

I get the simple type names for source types and resolved for binary
types. Now I want to have the fully qualified names for all the types,
regardless if they are source types or binary types.

I would like to know if it's possible in any way, based on the Java Model,
to get the fully qualified names of the types in the signature. If no,
what alternatives do I have other than parsing the AST ?

Thanks and best regards,
Domi

Report message to a moderator

Re: Retrieving fully qualified names of method and field signatures. [message #57198 is a reply to message #57146]

Mon, 20 April 2009 13:26

Ben Vitale

Messages: 247
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

You may want to post this question to the eclipse.tools.jdt group.

Cheers,
Ben

Tamas-Selicean Domitian wrote:
> Hello all :)
>
> I'm parsing a Java Project using the Java Model. I get to method and
> field declarations and I have encountered a problem. Using the following
> methods:
>
> IMethod#getSignature
> IMethod#getExceptionTypes
> IField#getTypeSignature
>
> I get the simple type names for source types and resolved for binary
> types. Now I want to have the fully qualified names for all the types,
> regardless if they are source types or binary types.
>
> I would like to know if it's possible in any way, based on the Java
> Model, to get the fully qualified names of the types in the signature.
> If no, what alternatives do I have other than parsing the AST ?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Domi
>

Report message to a moderator