|
Re: r10682 - prerequisites - requirement on interface [message #487837 is a reply to message #487826] |
Thu, 24 September 2009 14:23 |
|
On 09/24/2009 04:09 PM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> Added "propertyName" to IRequirment, to make a prerequisite capable of
> referencing a property in the ICapability returned as a resolution of
> the requirement.
>
> This was done since a requirement may be to any capability, and we do
> not want to expose every part name as a capability since all units of a
> particular "type" would then have the exact same capability - so far
> better to have a requirement on the "type"/"interface".
>
Not sure I understand. Why would you ever want to reference a property of something that has been resolved?
- thomas
|
|
|
|
Re: r10682 - prerequisites - requirement on interface [message #577980 is a reply to message #487826] |
Thu, 24 September 2009 14:23 |
|
On 09/24/2009 04:09 PM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> Added "propertyName" to IRequirment, to make a prerequisite capable of
> referencing a property in the ICapability returned as a resolution of
> the requirement.
>
> This was done since a requirement may be to any capability, and we do
> not want to expose every part name as a capability since all units of a
> particular "type" would then have the exact same capability - so far
> better to have a requirement on the "type"/"interface".
>
Not sure I understand. Why would you ever want to reference a property of something that has been resolved?
- thomas
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03080 seconds