Home » Modeling » UML2 » Behavior Execution Specification overlapping
| |
Re: Behavior Execution Specification overlapping [message #478250 is a reply to message #478247] |
Fri, 20 March 2009 13:40 |
Gabriel Merin Cubero Messages: 12 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi James,
Thanks for your quick answer, but I don't understand your explanation.
Which is the "root" BES and the "affixed" BES in your example? Would you
mind giving me more details in your example?
In addition, I use the start/finish properties of the to store the end
of the first/last message connected to it. Thanks to this and to the
fact that all my MOS are ordered (via GOs), I know where a Message is
really contected to.
I hope I have explained myself and thanks again for your help.
Note:
BES : BehaviorExecutionSpecification
MOS : MessageOccurrenceSpecification
GO : GeneralOrdering
Regards,
Gabriel.
James Bruck escribió:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> The Interaction would have an ordered list of InteractionFragment (see
> Interaction:getFragments() ).
> The start and end points of the BehaviorExecutionSpecification would be
> OccurrenceSpecification's that would be ordered in such a way as to make the
> execution appear "overlapped".
>
> For example, the Fragments collection could have the following elements.
>
> "start_big" - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
> "big" - BehaviorExecutionSpecification
> "start_small" - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
> "small" - BehaviorExecutionSpecification
> "finish_small" - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
> "finish_big " - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
>
>
> Cheers,
> - James.
>
>
> "Gabriel Merin Cubero" <gmerin@integranova.com> wrote in message
> news:gpl7mq$mtf$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Hello everyone!
>> In the OMG's UML2 specification,the BehaviorExecutionSpecifications (BES)
>> can be overlapped (to represent sub-executions). However, there is no
>> explanation of how to achiveve this. In other words, how do you represent
>> a sub-BES in a UML2 model?
>>
>> Can anyone give me a hint?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gabriel.
>
>
|
|
| | |
Re: Behavior Execution Specification overlapping [message #627444 is a reply to message #478247] |
Fri, 20 March 2009 13:40 |
Gabriel Merin Cubero Messages: 12 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi James,
Thanks for your quick answer, but I don't understand your explanation.
Which is the "root" BES and the "affixed" BES in your example? Would you
mind giving me more details in your example?
In addition, I use the start/finish properties of the to store the end
of the first/last message connected to it. Thanks to this and to the
fact that all my MOS are ordered (via GOs), I know where a Message is
really contected to.
I hope I have explained myself and thanks again for your help.
Note:
BES : BehaviorExecutionSpecification
MOS : MessageOccurrenceSpecification
GO : GeneralOrdering
Regards,
Gabriel.
James Bruck escribió:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> The Interaction would have an ordered list of InteractionFragment (see
> Interaction:getFragments() ).
> The start and end points of the BehaviorExecutionSpecification would be
> OccurrenceSpecification's that would be ordered in such a way as to make the
> execution appear "overlapped".
>
> For example, the Fragments collection could have the following elements.
>
> "start_big" - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
> "big" - BehaviorExecutionSpecification
> "start_small" - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
> "small" - BehaviorExecutionSpecification
> "finish_small" - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
> "finish_big " - ExecutionOccurrenceSpecification
>
>
> Cheers,
> - James.
>
>
> "Gabriel Merin Cubero" <gmerin@integranova.com> wrote in message
> news:gpl7mq$mtf$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Hello everyone!
>> In the OMG's UML2 specification,the BehaviorExecutionSpecifications (BES)
>> can be overlapped (to represent sub-executions). However, there is no
>> explanation of how to achiveve this. In other words, how do you represent
>> a sub-BES in a UML2 model?
>>
>> Can anyone give me a hint?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gabriel.
>
>
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Sep 26 06:43:02 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04130 seconds
|