Update scenario [message #433580] |
Sun, 19 March 2006 09:36 |
Thomas Rausch Messages: 3 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
--- english -----------------------------
Hello,
Question, like it regulates and/or, where one there which details reread
can.
I have now my program with the tables in the version 1.x outside and
want the program in the version 1.(x+1) to start now, in which some
tables are easily changed.
Gives a mechanism to lose and change nevertheless to the requirements
from 1.(x+1) contents over of the data not directly?
--- german -----------------------------
Hallo,
Frage, wie ihr das regelt bzw, wo man da was genaues nachlesen kann.
Ich habe jetzt mein Programm mit den Tabellen in der Version 1.x draußen
und will jetzt das Programm in der Version 1.(x+1) starten, in dem
einige Tabellen leicht geändert sind.
Gibt einen Mechanismus, den Inhalt der Daten nicht gleich zu verlieren
und trotzdem auf die Anforderungen von 1.(x+1) umzustellen?
--- Owing to to www.google.de -----------
|
|
|
Re: Update scenario [message #433639 is a reply to message #433580] |
Tue, 04 April 2006 17:21 |
Max Rydahl Andersen Messages: 233 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
huh?
> --- english -----------------------------
> Hello,
>
> Question, like it regulates and/or, where one there which details reread
> can.
>
> I have now my program with the tables in the version 1.x outside and
> want the program in the version 1.(x+1) to start now, in which some
> tables are easily changed.
>
> Gives a mechanism to lose and change nevertheless to the requirements
> from 1.(x+1) contents over of the data not directly?
>
> --- german -----------------------------
> Hallo,
>
> Frage, wie ihr das regelt bzw, wo man da was genaues nachlesen kann.
>
> Ich habe jetzt mein Programm mit den Tabellen in der Version 1.x draußen
> und will jetzt das Programm in der Version 1.(x+1) starten, in dem
> einige Tabellen leicht geändert sind.
>
> Gibt einen Mechanismus, den Inhalt der Daten nicht gleich zu verlieren
> und trotzdem auf die Anforderungen von 1.(x+1) umzustellen?
>
> --- Owing to to www.google.de -----------
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
Re: Update scenario [message #578177 is a reply to message #433580] |
Tue, 04 April 2006 17:21 |
Max Rydahl Andersen Messages: 233 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
huh?
> --- english -----------------------------
> Hello,
>
> Question, like it regulates and/or, where one there which details reread
> can.
>
> I have now my program with the tables in the version 1.x outside and
> want the program in the version 1.(x+1) to start now, in which some
> tables are easily changed.
>
> Gives a mechanism to lose and change nevertheless to the requirements
> from 1.(x+1) contents over of the data not directly?
>
> --- german -----------------------------
> Hallo,
>
> Frage, wie ihr das regelt bzw, wo man da was genaues nachlesen kann.
>
> Ich habe jetzt mein Programm mit den Tabellen in der Version 1.x draußen
> und will jetzt das Programm in der Version 1.(x+1) starten, in dem
> einige Tabellen leicht geändert sind.
>
> Gibt einen Mechanismus, den Inhalt der Daten nicht gleich zu verlieren
> und trotzdem auf die Anforderungen von 1.(x+1) umzustellen?
>
> --- Owing to to www.google.de -----------
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03266 seconds