Eclipse Community Forums: EclipseLink » Why is a child of a OneToMany relation not updated? (works with TopLink)

Help

Home

Home » Eclipse Projects » EclipseLink » Why is a child of a OneToMany relation not updated? (works with TopLink)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Why is a child of a OneToMany relation not updated? (works with TopLink) [message #387375]

Thu, 23 April 2009 13:11

Chris Cornelis

Messages: 2
Registered: July 2009

Junior Member

Hi,

I'm in the process of migrating from TopLink to EclipseLink, but I ran
into a behavioral difference. When the parent of a OneToMany relation
(cascaded) is merged, the child object id is not updated with EclipseLink.

The testcode below works fine with TopLink, but the with EclipseLink the
last assertTrue() fails. Can anyone shed some light on this?

/************** TestChild **************/
@Entity
public class TestChild {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 4743558733184018876L;

private int id;

public TestChild() {
}

@Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name="id")
public int getId() {
return id;
}

public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
}

/************** TestParent **************/
@Entity
@Table(name="testParent")
public class TestParent implements java.io.Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 7480710253587290253L;

private int id;
private Collection<TestChild> children;

public TestParent() {
this.children=null;
}

@Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name="id")
public int getId() {
return id;
}

public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}

@OneToMany(cascade=ALL)
public Collection<TestChild> getChildren() {
return this.children;
}

public void setChildren(Collection<TestChild> children) {
this.children = children;
}
}

/************** UnitTest **************/
public class MigrationTest {
@Test
public void testTestParent() {
TestParent testParent = new TestParent();
EntityTransaction transaction = entityManager.getTransaction();
transaction.begin();
entityManager.persist(testParent);

TestChild testChild = new TestChild();
Collection<TestChild> children = new LinkedList<TestChild>();
children.add(testChild);
testParent.setChildren(children);

entityManager.merge(testParent);
entityManager.flush();
transaction.commit();

assertTrue(((TestChild)(testParent.getChildren().toArray()[0 ])).getId() !=
0);
assertTrue(testChild.getId() != 0); // ===> FAILS WITH ECLIPSELINK
}
}

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why is a child of a OneToMany relation not updated? (works with TopLink) [message #387376 is a reply to message #387375]

Thu, 23 April 2009 14:25

James Sutherland

Messages: 1939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Senior Member

The child id should definitely be getting assigned, I cannot see how this
could occur.

Enable logging on finest and include the log.

---
James
http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink---Users-f26658.html

James : Wiki : Book : Blog : Twitter

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why is a child of a OneToMany relation not updated? (works with TopLink) [message #387377 is a reply to message #387376]

Thu, 23 April 2009 14:59

Gordon Yorke

Messages: 78
Registered: July 2009

Member

The id is not assigned to that instance because that is a detached
instance. In TopLink the instance passed into the merge was previously
treated as the original and placed in the shared cache but because of an
behavioural expectation shift, spawned by JPA, on detached objects this
object is no longer treated as the shared cache instance and is therefore
not updated post commit.
--Gordon

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Refreshing objects with @Transient fields
Next Topic:	JPA - How to use AVG while computing Calendar date.time differences

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 26 18:45:11 GMT 2024

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter