|
Re: Associations with message/sequence flow [message #374108 is a reply to message #374106] |
Tue, 03 July 2007 18:15 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com
Hi Aurelien,
this was not possible in GMF 1.0. It is now possible with GMF 2.0, we
are in the process of migrating to it.
As for the messaging edges connections between pools, feel free to file
a bug so that you can stay in the loop and know when it is fixed.
Regards,
Antoine
Aurélien MOREAU wrote:
> Hi,
> To specify the data flow of my process, I use data object artifacts
> connected to sequence/message connections with associations. But in
> current STP/BPMN model, SequenceEdge and MessagingEdge don't inherite
> from IdentifiableNode (then no association is possible). Could you
> explain me this choice ?
--
Intalio, the Open Source BPMS Company
<a href="http://www.intalio.com">http://www.intalio.com</a>
<a href="http://bpms.intalio.com">Community website</a>
|
|
|
|
Re: Associations with message/sequence flow [message #589615 is a reply to message #374106] |
Tue, 03 July 2007 18:15 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com
Hi Aurelien,
this was not possible in GMF 1.0. It is now possible with GMF 2.0, we
are in the process of migrating to it.
As for the messaging edges connections between pools, feel free to file
a bug so that you can stay in the loop and know when it is fixed.
Regards,
Antoine
Aurélien MOREAU wrote:
> Hi,
> To specify the data flow of my process, I use data object artifacts
> connected to sequence/message connections with associations. But in
> current STP/BPMN model, SequenceEdge and MessagingEdge don't inherite
> from IdentifiableNode (then no association is possible). Could you
> explain me this choice ?
--
Intalio, the Open Source BPMS Company
<a href="http://www.intalio.com">http://www.intalio.com</a>
<a href="http://bpms.intalio.com">Community website</a>
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01904 seconds