Eclipse Community Forums: Capella General » Difference between deploying Node PC and declaring parent

Home » Polarsys » Capella General » Difference between deploying Node PC and declaring parent

Difference between deploying Node PC and declaring parent [message #1833335]

Fri, 09 October 2020 07:05

Eclipse User

In the physical architecture, it seems I in Capella 1.4.1 is able to both deploy a PC on another PC, and declare one PC as component of another PC.

Is there a difference?

Re: Difference between deploying Node PC and declaring parent [message #1833357 is a reply to message #1833335]

Sat, 10 October 2020 13:12

Eclipse User

Hi Asmund,
Have you looked at this pat of the Capella 1.4 webinar? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhRpOjfyPbk&t=875s
Not sure it answers completely your question though..
Stephane

Re: Difference between deploying Node PC and declaring parent [message #1833471 is a reply to message #1833357]

Wed, 14 October 2020 04:29

Eclipse User

Thank you for the pointer, that explains it well and answers my question. You deploy behaviours on physical nodes, but physical nodes are part of each-other.

I am not fully onboard on the need for the strong distinction between node that have behaviour, and nodes that do not. An adjustable wall in a flotation unit, or fixed overflow channel in a dam vs control valve. A chute vs transportation screw? I guess it ends up being modelers choice, but I am not that experienced yet....

Re: Difference between deploying Node PC and declaring parent [message #1834776 is a reply to message #1833471]

Tue, 17 November 2020 11:39

Eclipse User

You may have a look to this similar post: https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/1105080/

Previous Topic:	Capturing Physical Links as a group in Physical Architecture
Next Topic:	ARCADIA documents outputs

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Wed Nov 05 07:46:42 EST 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter