|
|
|
|
Re: Problem with Tree and Hide Row [message #1800684 is a reply to message #1800670] |
Sat, 05 January 2019 09:27 |
Yves Prelot Messages: 13 Registered: September 2016 |
Junior Member |
|
|
See Row 17 & 18 in the "after" image, and compare with the same items in the "before" image: they are shown with children they don't have. Conversely, Row 14 in the "before" image has lost its own children.
Furthermore, and logically, when you click on the +/- signs in the "after" tree, nothing happens.
The 4 inital files are all that you need to have the example actually run.
Your example looks like it works, but I believe it doesn't : it is too simple as far as trees are involved (depth too low) for the problems to materialize ; in addition, you use a non standard compare function for the tree, which I believe few users would use; I tried it on my own exemple, and it renders the tree in a quite different, not very natural, way.
[Updated on: Sat, 05 January 2019 09:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Problem with Tree and Hide Row [message #1800690 is a reply to message #1800689] |
Sat, 05 January 2019 15:58 |
Yves Prelot Messages: 13 Registered: September 2016 |
Junior Member |
|
|
I understand all of this and one of the reasons I am using NatTable is because it supports trees so well.
I also fully understand TreeList and I even directly use it to implement my own TreeRenderer (I need configurable lines between parent and child).
Unfortunately, I don't have the time to investigate that issue with the hide row function which is for me of marginal use. I still believe you should open a ticket, but of course you do as you wish.
Regards
Yves
[Updated on: Sat, 05 January 2019 15:59] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03783 seconds