Eclipse Community Forums: EMF » [xcore] No difference with annotation use

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » EMF » [xcore] No difference with annotation use

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

[xcore] No difference with annotation use [message #1695390]

Wed, 13 May 2015 23:42

Paul Roubekas

Messages: 207
Registered: March 2012
Location: Chattanooga, TN USA

Senior Member

While doing all the steps on this https://wiki.eclipse.org/Xcore#Specifying_an_Annotation wiki section I noticed that any base Impl class already has the extends "MinimalEObjectImpl.Container", annotation or not. What am I missing?

Oxygen 3a
Windows 10

Report message to a moderator

Re: [xcore] No difference with annotation use [message #1695399 is a reply to message #1695390]

Thu, 14 May 2015 05:31

Ed Merks

Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Paul,

Yes, that's the default for Xcore-based GenModels. At some point I
decided that given that Xcore models are new, they could be initialized
to have improved defaults without affecting existing clients with
unexpected changes... But that leaves that example in the documentation
as not the best example.

On 14/05/2015 1:42 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> While doing all the steps on this
> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Xcore#Specifying_an_Annotation wiki section I
> noticed that any base Impl class already has the extends
> "MinimalEObjectImpl.Container", annotation or not. What am I missing?

Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	GenModel fails on some ECore types
Next Topic:	How to force EMF not to manipulate reference ids

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 26 09:43:13 GMT 2024

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter