Home » Archived » DSDP - Mobile Tools for Java (MTJ) » Mobile JUnit
| |
| Re: Mobile JUnit [message #8703 is a reply to message #8691] |
Wed, 23 November 2005 11:39   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
Hi Minna,
You are quite right - it is MIDlet slanted. I realise it also assumes and
mandates UEI-ish (XEI wrapped as much as we like) behaviour is available..
execute test -> device downloads package -> device installs package ->
invokes package -> removes package. If you have, for example, a CDC
set-top box, this behaviour cannot be assumed. I guess some context
specific implementation is unavoidable whilst we have an "out-of-the box"
answer available for most scenarios.
I will address this in the UC.
/T
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> the Mobile JUnit UC looked quite good.
> I would, however, like to see it in a more general level ie targeting the
> whole Java ME platform testing not just MIDlet based test cases. The
> description gives the idea that this UC would only enable testing of MIDlet
> enabled devices but we need to take into consideration that the application
> can be, in addition to a MIDlet, Applet, Xlet or the tradional static main()
> application. I think that this UC is a good strting point, but could be
> extended to target testing of all the Java ME platform application models.
> Rgds,
> Minna
|
|
|
| Re: Mobile JUnit [message #8822 is a reply to message #8703] |
Wed, 30 November 2005 07:16 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that J2MEUnit is MIDP slanted ie no reflection..
Thomas Bailey wrote:
> Hi Minna,
>
> You are quite right - it is MIDlet slanted. I realise it also assumes
> and mandates UEI-ish (XEI wrapped as much as we like) behaviour is
> available.. execute test -> device downloads package -> device installs
> package -> invokes package -> removes package. If you have, for example,
> a CDC set-top box, this behaviour cannot be assumed. I guess some
> context specific implementation is unavoidable whilst we have an
> "out-of-the box" answer available for most scenarios.
>
> I will address this in the UC.
>
> /T
>
>
> Minna Bloigu wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>> the Mobile JUnit UC looked quite good.
>> I would, however, like to see it in a more general level ie targeting the
>> whole Java ME platform testing not just MIDlet based test cases. The
>> description gives the idea that this UC would only enable testing of
>> MIDlet
>> enabled devices but we need to take into consideration that the
>> application
>> can be, in addition to a MIDlet, Applet, Xlet or the tradional static
>> main()
>> application. I think that this UC is a good strting point, but could be
>> extended to target testing of all the Java ME platform application
>> models.
>
>
>> Rgds,
>> Minna
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Mobile JUnit [message #562682 is a reply to message #6829] |
Wed, 23 November 2005 03:26 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Thomas,
the Mobile JUnit UC looked quite good.
I would, however, like to see it in a more general level ie targeting the
whole Java ME platform testing not just MIDlet based test cases. The
description gives the idea that this UC would only enable testing of MIDlet
enabled devices but we need to take into consideration that the application
can be, in addition to a MIDlet, Applet, Xlet or the tradional static main()
application. I think that this UC is a good strting point, but could be
extended to target testing of all the Java ME platform application models.
Rgds,
Minna
|
|
|
| Re: Mobile JUnit [message #562704 is a reply to message #8691] |
Wed, 23 November 2005 11:39 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
Hi Minna,
You are quite right - it is MIDlet slanted. I realise it also assumes and
mandates UEI-ish (XEI wrapped as much as we like) behaviour is available..
execute test -> device downloads package -> device installs package ->
invokes package -> removes package. If you have, for example, a CDC
set-top box, this behaviour cannot be assumed. I guess some context
specific implementation is unavoidable whilst we have an "out-of-the box"
answer available for most scenarios.
I will address this in the UC.
/T
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> the Mobile JUnit UC looked quite good.
> I would, however, like to see it in a more general level ie targeting the
> whole Java ME platform testing not just MIDlet based test cases. The
> description gives the idea that this UC would only enable testing of MIDlet
> enabled devices but we need to take into consideration that the application
> can be, in addition to a MIDlet, Applet, Xlet or the tradional static main()
> application. I think that this UC is a good strting point, but could be
> extended to target testing of all the Java ME platform application models.
> Rgds,
> Minna
|
|
|
| Re: Mobile JUnit [message #562965 is a reply to message #8703] |
Wed, 30 November 2005 07:16 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that J2MEUnit is MIDP slanted ie no reflection..
Thomas Bailey wrote:
> Hi Minna,
>
> You are quite right - it is MIDlet slanted. I realise it also assumes
> and mandates UEI-ish (XEI wrapped as much as we like) behaviour is
> available.. execute test -> device downloads package -> device installs
> package -> invokes package -> removes package. If you have, for example,
> a CDC set-top box, this behaviour cannot be assumed. I guess some
> context specific implementation is unavoidable whilst we have an
> "out-of-the box" answer available for most scenarios.
>
> I will address this in the UC.
>
> /T
>
>
> Minna Bloigu wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>> the Mobile JUnit UC looked quite good.
>> I would, however, like to see it in a more general level ie targeting the
>> whole Java ME platform testing not just MIDlet based test cases. The
>> description gives the idea that this UC would only enable testing of
>> MIDlet
>> enabled devices but we need to take into consideration that the
>> application
>> can be, in addition to a MIDlet, Applet, Xlet or the tradional static
>> main()
>> application. I think that this UC is a good strting point, but could be
>> extended to target testing of all the Java ME platform application
>> models.
>
>
>> Rgds,
>> Minna
>
>
>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 01 06:03:22 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04383 seconds |
Home