| Supporting new mylyn connector? [message #5303] |
Fri, 29 June 2007 19:43  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex_blewitt.yahoo.com
I'm interested on how to integrate mylar to a (currently) unsupported task tracking system. There are RCP-style calls that I can make to acquire data, and authentication isn't done with standard HTTP auth, so I need to do a bit more setup work than the generic web connector allows for.
Is there any documentation on how to go about writing your own Mylyn connector?
Alex.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Supporting new mylyn connector? [message #10877 is a reply to message #8771] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 16:53  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: beatmik.acm.org
Werner Keil wrote:
> Gail Murphy wrote:
>> An integrator's reference is available at
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Integrator_Reference .
>>
> Except its headline, the content still seems pretty much covering older
> releases of Myl(ar)yn ?;-)
>
> Will this be updated at some point?
>
> I'm not a direct code contributor for Mylyn, but I provided many
> suggestions and reported bugs, so I'd love to help with those docs, if
> help is required there?
Hi Werner,
Help would be *very* welcome there. The more that we can get
integrators to help with documentation the more that the committers can
focus on API and UI. Please note that "better to ask for forgiveness
than permission" approach that we encourage for wiki doc contributions,
since we review all changes.
Mik
|
|
|
| Re: Supporting new mylyn connector? [message #569191 is a reply to message #5303] |
Sat, 30 June 2007 14:34 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Alex,
Its always great to hear about new connector development.
An integrator's reference is available at
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Integrator_Reference
I believe it was updated based on some hand-porting of existing connectors
to the new tasks api in Mylyn 2.0. Contributions back to that wiki are
always great to further clarify integration steps, etc.
As the wiki points out, there is also now an integrators mailing list for
Mylyn, which is a great place to ask questions if and when you hit any snags
in hooking up the new task repository.
Gail.
"Alex Blewitt" <alex_blewitt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1409968103.1351183160627924.JavaMail.root@cp9.dzone.com...
> I'm interested on how to integrate mylar to a (currently) unsupported task
> tracking system. There are RCP-style calls that I can make to acquire
> data, and authentication isn't done with standard HTTP auth, so I need to
> do a bit more setup work than the generic web connector allows for.
>
> Is there any documentation on how to go about writing your own Mylyn
> connector?
>
> Alex.
|
|
|
| Re: Supporting new mylyn connector? [message #570495 is a reply to message #6703] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 15:05 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Gail Murphy wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Its always great to hear about new connector development.
>
> An integrator's reference is available at
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Integrator_Reference
>
Except its headline, the content still seems pretty much covering older
releases of Myl(ar)yn ?;-)
Will this be updated at some point?
I'm not a direct code contributor for Mylyn, but I provided many
suggestions and reported bugs, so I'd love to help with those docs, if
help is required there?
|
|
|
| Re: Supporting new mylyn connector? [message #570780 is a reply to message #8771] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 16:53 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Werner Keil wrote:
> Gail Murphy wrote:
>> An integrator's reference is available at
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Integrator_Reference
>>
> Except its headline, the content still seems pretty much covering older
> releases of Myl(ar)yn ?;-)
>
> Will this be updated at some point?
>
> I'm not a direct code contributor for Mylyn, but I provided many
> suggestions and reported bugs, so I'd love to help with those docs, if
> help is required there?
Hi Werner,
Help would be *very* welcome there. The more that we can get
integrators to help with documentation the more that the committers can
focus on API and UI. Please note that "better to ask for forgiveness
than permission" approach that we encourage for wiki doc contributions,
since we review all changes.
Mik
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04376 seconds
Home