Eclipse Community Forums: EGL Development Tools » EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available

Home » Archived » EGL Development Tools » EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available

EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available [message #762956]

Thu, 08 December 2011 16:33

Eclipse User

In case you missed it - EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is now available! See the Download section of the EDT site for download and installation instructions.

If you were using the .7 M3 build, you'll need to add or edit the update site to
http://download.eclipse.org/edt/updates/1.0

You should be able to use the Check for Updates menu option from the Help menu.

We've also updated the EDT website and wiki with additional information. Let us know what you think!

Theresa

Re: EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available [message #762971 is a reply to message #762956]

Thu, 08 December 2011 17:19

Eclipse User

Slashdot:

http://developers.slashdot.org/story/11/12/08/228224/ibm-releases-open-source-egl-development-tools

Re: EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available [message #762983 is a reply to message #762971]

Thu, 08 December 2011 17:57

Eclipse User

Thanks for sharing Dan!

We're happy to see the word spread about EGL being open and EDT.

Re: EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available [message #763434 is a reply to message #762983]

Fri, 09 December 2011 13:59

Eclipse User

The predominantly negative comments on /. do point out the uphill battle that EDT faces. It's people speaking from ignorance but I think that the /. audience IS your target audience (the developer community in general rather than just the segment of the developer community that has already been successfully using IBM solutions for the last umpteen years).

[Updated on: Fri, 09 December 2011 14:04] by Moderator

Re: EGL Development Tools (EDT) v0.7 is available [message #763463 is a reply to message #763434]

Fri, 09 December 2011 15:27

Eclipse User

As I said on the RBD forum - read the comments and see if you can find which one is mine. Two points for the first correct answer. Cool