| JWT actions [message #4018] |
Fri, 23 December 2005 16:05  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: fabrice.dewasmes.openwide.fr
As things are moving these last days a quick summary of actions which are
being taken and actions still to take :
- open public CVS (Open Wide)
- put initial code contributions in CVS (Open Wide, Allen Young, Optena)
- discuss about possible use of BPMN
- add people on proposal (Allen Young ? Others from Shanghai JiaoTong
University ? Optena Corp)
I think we should maybe have a conference call to see how things can
evolve. I'm going to see with Objectweb to see if we can get a conference
bridge.
Fabrice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: JWT actions [message #10408 is a reply to message #7785] |
Wed, 11 January 2006 18:47  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Fabrice,
I am certainly interested and repeat all your steps almost identically.
But my project continuation is redecided on monthly basis and certainly it
cannot be more than 2-3 months more from now.
I am not sure in which I shall be in a month (or even weeks).
As a private person I am interested but I cannot represent/reveal yet any
entity/company.
I myself just reevaluate my strategies (and even vision) and so far found
your discussion quite revealing in order to propose my company to get back
to vision phase what somehow was by-passed.
I am certainly shall share, participate, and help, if I stay in this area
and even platform.
Thank you for your information.
Guennadi Vanine
"Fabrice Dewasmes" <fabrice.dewasmes@openwide.fr> wrote in message
news:dptceb$ao8$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>> Fabrice:
>> Sorry, I missed your train
>> Online where?
>> Can you repeat the link?
>> What I can find is only:
>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/jwt/
>>
>
> What I meant was that participants have been added to the online JWT
> proposal. The initial code contribution will be put on temporary forge
> platform as soon as that platform is ready which should hopefully today.
>
>> BTW, how can someone participate (since I have some impressions that this
>> forum doesn't correspond to real activity and importance of this project)
>
> By now, we are in the proposal phase. That means that :
>
> * we must gather communities around the project
> * we need to discuss about the proposal on these points :
> - interest of the project
> - proposed architecture
> - proposed ways to implement
> - synergies with other eclipse projects.
>
> So if you're willing to participate, you're more than welcome. Please let
> me know if you'd like to be considered as interested participant or as as
> a committer.
> I've got the feeling that we're nearly ready to ask for creation review
> but we still have to get our mind clear on few points :
> - Roman Zulauf is working on separating graphical representation, model
> and grammar so that any visual representation and any grammar can be
> plugged in.
> - possible use of EMF and GMF
> - use of BPMN as first representation
>
> Fabrice
>
>>
>> Guennadi Vanine
>> "Fabrice Dewasmes" <fabrice.dewasmes@openwide.fr> wrote in message
>> news:dpjh4c$tf8$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>
>>>Fabrice Dewasmes wrote:
>>>
>>>>Here is action list status
>>>>
>>>>- open public CVS (Open Wide) - I've requested the creation of a
>>>>dedicated gforge on our platform
>>>>- put initial code contributions in CVS (Open Wide, Allen Young,
>>>>Optena) - I've requested the creation of a dedicated gforge on our
>>>>platform
>>>>- discuss about possible use of BPMN - in progress
>>>>- add people on proposal - requested add to Eclipse
>>>
>>>That's online now.
>>>
>>>>The GForge platform should be ready on next monday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Fabrice
>>
>>
|
|
|
| Re: JWT actions [message #13071 is a reply to message #10408] |
Fri, 13 January 2006 05:28 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: fabrice.dewasmes.openwide.fr
I'm not sure I got you on everything...
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
> Fabrice,
> I am certainly interested and repeat all your steps almost identically.
Mmh which steps ?
> But my project continuation is redecided on monthly basis and certainly it
> cannot be more than 2-3 months more from now.
> I am not sure in which I shall be in a month (or even weeks).
>
> As a private person I am interested but I cannot represent/reveal yet any
> entity/company.
> I myself just reevaluate my strategies (and even vision) and so far found
> your discussion quite revealing in order to propose my company to get back
> to vision phase what somehow was by-passed.
>
> I am certainly shall share, participate, and help, if I stay in this area
> and even platform.
Does this mean you want to be listed on interested participants for the
project ?
> Thank you for your information.
>
Fabrice
> Guennadi Vanine
>
> "Fabrice Dewasmes" <fabrice.dewasmes@openwide.fr> wrote in message
> news:dptceb$ao8$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>
>>Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>>
>>>Fabrice:
>>>Sorry, I missed your train
>>>Online where?
>>>Can you repeat the link?
>>>What I can find is only:
>>>http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/jwt/
>>>
>>
>>What I meant was that participants have been added to the online JWT
>>proposal. The initial code contribution will be put on temporary forge
>>platform as soon as that platform is ready which should hopefully today.
>>
>>
>>>BTW, how can someone participate (since I have some impressions that this
>>>forum doesn't correspond to real activity and importance of this project)
>>
>>By now, we are in the proposal phase. That means that :
>>
>>* we must gather communities around the project
>>* we need to discuss about the proposal on these points :
>> - interest of the project
>> - proposed architecture
>> - proposed ways to implement
>> - synergies with other eclipse projects.
>>
>>So if you're willing to participate, you're more than welcome. Please let
>>me know if you'd like to be considered as interested participant or as as
>>a committer.
>>I've got the feeling that we're nearly ready to ask for creation review
>>but we still have to get our mind clear on few points :
>>- Roman Zulauf is working on separating graphical representation, model
>>and grammar so that any visual representation and any grammar can be
>>plugged in.
>>- possible use of EMF and GMF
>>- use of BPMN as first representation
>>
>>Fabrice
>>
>>
>>>Guennadi Vanine
>>>"Fabrice Dewasmes" <fabrice.dewasmes@openwide.fr> wrote in message
>>>news:dpjh4c$tf8$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Fabrice Dewasmes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Here is action list status
>>>>>
>>>>>- open public CVS (Open Wide) - I've requested the creation of a
>>>>>dedicated gforge on our platform
>>>>>- put initial code contributions in CVS (Open Wide, Allen Young,
>>>>>Optena) - I've requested the creation of a dedicated gforge on our
>>>>>platform
>>>>>- discuss about possible use of BPMN - in progress
>>>>>- add people on proposal - requested add to Eclipse
>>>>
>>>>That's online now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The GForge platform should be ready on next monday.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>
|
|
|
| my name is not secret but I am not sure in continuation [message #13368 is a reply to message #13071] |
Fri, 13 January 2006 10:01 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
> Mmh which steps ?
JWT Proposal doc, (ideas of) discussions (of design solutions) in this forum
and the feeling of participation (I do not have anybody to discuss my
project that is vey similar)
> Does this mean you want to be listed on interested participants for the
> project ?
Thank u for this question.
I hoped my babbling will not have continuation and I did not understand at
that time what I wanted.
You may put me as:
Guennadi V. Vanine, Independent Cosultant, Lisbon
Email: gennady_vanin-eclipse@yahoo.com.br
or missing it in list will not make me incomfortable in any way
(since I am in love with .NET and my strategic interests are there and I do
not feel that Java community is flexible enough to like them. Though I am
Sun Certified Programmer for Java2 Platform).
I just cannot guarantee that I stay with Java and Eclipse in a month. But I
am certainly interested in Workflows, BMP engines, standards, patterns,
design and architecture of JWT.
Guennadi Vanine
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09219 seconds
Home