| Home » General (non-technical) » Eclipse Foundation » Eclipse VM
 Goto Forum:| 
| Eclipse VM [message #5458] | Tue, 19 October 2004 12:27  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Hi everyone, Lately I was wondering about the future of the Eclipse platform,
 community and consortium with regards to its foundation, Java the
 language and the platform. I must admit I'm one of those who are really
 disappointed on how Sun manages the whole Java development; still give
 them some credit but is all about the future of this platform (Java) and
 thats whats bothering me.
 
 Now back to Eclipse, I think that we are in the position in which we
 should seriously consider on securing the future of this wonderful
 platform and community.
 Securing and controlling directly the foundation of the Eclipse platform
 is, in my opinion, the most strategic aspect that has to be taken in
 account by the whole Eclipse community and Consortium. Not long ago, IBM
 the founder and one of the most influent consortium member expressed the
 willing to initiate an effort that should create an open source Java
 Platform.
 Open source is the key word that represents the crucial way on which
 Eclipse is build.
 
 We have great efforts already taken place such as GNU Classpath and GNU
 GCJ, both have some astonishing progress in implementing a free and
 compatible class library and compiler for Java. Others like Kaffe have
 progressed very well also. Another important project is SwingWT, an
 effort to implement Swing API on top of SWT peers.
 
 What Eclipse should do?
 I think that it has to create and found a team dedicated on working on
 securing it's foundation. Ideally we should start by creating a project
 and proposal that will formalize this work and then evaluate the options
 available already, I'm referring to GNU Classpath as it is already the
 foundation for many open source JVMs.
 
 GNU Classpath needs the support that Eclipse could give to it and
 Eclipse should have the strategic foundation secured. As many relatively
 small OS projects it needs the marketing muscle and the resources (as in
 monetary and human) that commercial partners can offer to evolve.
 
 On the same lines, we need to consider the other side of  the Sun :) ,
 meaning Swing is and will be one of the most used Java UI API around,
 for a while ;) . We need to offer to developers an easy way to integrate
 their existing UI code on Eclipse, other that using artificial bridges
 between SWT and Swing. SwingWT should be put as top priority on the list
 as an alernative integration hub. It has a good start in that its
 already implementing a good portion of Swing and AWT APIs on top of SWT.
 
 I'm really hopping that at least some of the things I've talked about
 are,will be considered and that IBM(as is the one who triggered this
 whole debate about OS Java), will invest in this strategic aspect.
 
 Waiting your opinions...
 Best Regards,
 Radu
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Re: Eclipse VM [message #6852 is a reply to message #6472] | Thu, 11 November 2004 10:14   |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Thanks, Already checked that:) as you can see from my comment (about GCJ Builder).
 By the way you should check it out http://gcjbuilder.sourceforge.net.
 This is my small contribution for the community.
 Anyhow I guess no official comments ca be made for the issues I've
 raised before, maybe facts will tell more.
 
 regards,
 Radu
 
 ilias wrote:
 > Radu Racariu wrote:
 >
 >> Hi everyone,
 >> Lately I was wondering about the future of the Eclipse platform,
 >> community and consortium with regards to its foundation, Java the
 >> language and the platform. I must admit I'm one of those who are really
 >> disappointed on how Sun manages the whole Java development; still give
 >> them some credit but is all about the future of this platform (Java) and
 >> thats whats bothering me.
 >
 > [...]
 >
 >> I'm really hopping that at least some of the things I've talked about
 >> are,will be considered and that IBM(as is the one who triggered this
 >> whole debate about OS Java), will invest in this strategic aspect.
 >>
 >> Waiting your opinions...
 >
 >
 > this links should be interesting to you:
 >
 >  http://www.coconut-palm-software.com/the_visual_editor/2004/ 10/30
 >
 >  http://www.coconut-palm-software.com/the_visual_editor/eclip se_rcp/native_compilation.comments
 >
 >
 >> Best Regards,
 >> Radu
 >
 >
 > .
 >
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Re: Eclipse VM [message #7204 is a reply to message #6852] | Mon, 15 November 2004 19:47  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Thanks - http://gcjbuilder.sourceforge.net - is a big help. :) -
 Steve
 
 Radu Racariu wrote:
 
 > Thanks,
 > Already checked that:) as you can see from my comment (about GCJ Builder).
 > By the way you should check it out http://gcjbuilder.sourceforge.net.
 > This is my small contribution for the community.
 > Anyhow I guess no official comments ca be made for the issues I've
 > raised before, maybe facts will tell more.
 >
 > regards,
 > Radu
 >
 > ilias wrote:
 >
 >> Radu Racariu wrote:
 >>
 >>> Hi everyone,
 >>> Lately I was wondering about the future of the Eclipse platform,
 >>> community and consortium with regards to its foundation, Java the
 >>> language and the platform. I must admit I'm one of those who are really
 >>> disappointed on how Sun manages the whole Java development; still give
 >>> them some credit but is all about the future of this platform (Java) and
 >>> thats whats bothering me.
 >>
 >>
 >> [...]
 >>
 >>> I'm really hopping that at least some of the things I've talked about
 >>> are,will be considered and that IBM(as is the one who triggered this
 >>> whole debate about OS Java), will invest in this strategic aspect.
 >>>
 >>> Waiting your opinions...
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> this links should be interesting to you:
 >>
 >>  http://www.coconut-palm-software.com/the_visual_editor/2004/ 10/30
 >>
 >>  http://www.coconut-palm-software.com/the_visual_editor/eclip se_rcp/native_compilation.comments
 >>
 >>
 >>> Best Regards,
 >>> Radu
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> .
 >>
 |  |  |  | 
 
 
 Current Time: Fri Oct 31 19:49:39 EDT 2025 
 Powered by FUDForum . Page generated in 0.03566 seconds |