Table V_SCROLL Issue [message #650049] |
Fri, 21 January 2011 09:37  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello RAP community,
I have encountered an issue with the table widget regarding vertical scrolling. I am working
against RAP 1.4 M4. The following does not work for me:
- Enforce appearance of vertical scroll bar
- Scroll down
- Increase table height
As a result the top table rows that were scrolled out of view are not scrolled back into view
as is the case in SWT/RCP.
Additionally, I have encountered a similar issue with horizontal scolling. If the horizontal scrollbar
is moved to the the middle or the right end and the table width is increased, the rows are positioned
properly, but the columns seem to stay in their original position.
Is this a known issue ? Do you get the same behavior ? Is that behavior expected ?
Thanks,
tibersept
|
|
|
Re: Table V_SCROLL Issue [message #650079 is a reply to message #650049] |
Fri, 21 January 2011 10:52   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi tibersept,
today we fixed a similar problem with Tree (actually it was an issue
with the new Scrollbar). There is a possibility, the fix in the
Scrollbar to fix this issue too. To double check the problem, could you
open a bug with a snippet to reproduce it?
Thanks,
Ivan
On 1/21/2011 4:37 PM, tibersept wrote:
> Hello RAP community,
>
> I have encountered an issue with the table widget regarding vertical
> scrolling. I am working against RAP 1.4 M4. The following does not
> work for me:
>
>
> Enforce appearance of vertical scroll bar
> Scroll down
> Increase table height
>
>
> As a result the top table rows that were scrolled out of view are not
> scrolled back into view as is the case in SWT/RCP.
> Additionally, I have encountered a similar issue with horizontal
> scolling. If the horizontal scrollbar is moved to the the middle or
> the right end and the table width is increased, the rows are
> positioned properly, but the columns seem to stay in their original
> position.
>
> Is this a known issue ? Do you get the same behavior ? Is that
> behavior expected ?
>
> Thanks,
> tibersept
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05061 seconds