| Order of super types when converting from uml model to ecore [message #477146] |
Thu, 27 March 2008 11:23  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
How can one control the order of super types when converting an UML
model to an Ecore model?
In UML.merged.uml Package has three generalization relationships:
PackageableElement, Namespace and TeplateableElement in that order. In
UML.ecore Package has three supertypes: Namespace, PackageableElement
and TemplateableElement. The order is different which is important for EMF.
Thanks,
Vmir
|
|
|
| Re: Order of super types when converting from uml model to ecore [message #477158 is a reply to message #477146] |
Fri, 28 March 2008 11:18  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Vmir,
There is an option in the conversion process "OPTION__SUPER_CLASS_ORDER".
Cheers,
- James.
"Vladimir Hirsl" <vladimirh@edgewater.ca> wrote in message
news:fsge4q$jpe$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> How can one control the order of super types when converting an UML model
> to an Ecore model?
> In UML.merged.uml Package has three generalization relationships:
> PackageableElement, Namespace and TeplateableElement in that order. In
> UML.ecore Package has three supertypes: Namespace, PackageableElement and
> TemplateableElement. The order is different which is important for EMF.
>
> Thanks,
> Vmir
|
|
|
| Re: Order of super types when converting from uml model to ecore [message #626300 is a reply to message #477146] |
Fri, 28 March 2008 11:18 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Vmir,
There is an option in the conversion process "OPTION__SUPER_CLASS_ORDER".
Cheers,
- James.
"Vladimir Hirsl" <vladimirh@edgewater.ca> wrote in message
news:fsge4q$jpe$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> How can one control the order of super types when converting an UML model
> to an Ecore model?
> In UML.merged.uml Package has three generalization relationships:
> PackageableElement, Namespace and TeplateableElement in that order. In
> UML.ecore Package has three supertypes: Namespace, PackageableElement and
> TemplateableElement. The order is different which is important for EMF.
>
> Thanks,
> Vmir
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03639 seconds
Home