| 
| C++ parser stability & completeness [message #57656] | Fri, 10 January 2003 08:14  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Originally posted by: scott.finnie.virgin.net 
 [Apologies if this is answered elsewhere, pointers appreciated if so].
 
 I'm considering some C++ analysis tools, so require access to parse
 trees --> am interested in whether the cdt parser will fit the bill.
 
 For example,
 
 . does it parse all c++ (e.g. method bodies as well as declarations,
 templates)?
 . Is the parse tree structure documented?  If so, where?
 . How to access the parse tree?  (e.g. API?)
 . any platform limitations?  (e.g. windows-isms not handled?)
 
 Many thanks.
 
 - Scott.
 |  |  |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
| 
| Re: C++ parser stability & completeness [message #61089 is a reply to message #57656] | Mon, 03 February 2003 20:02  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Originally posted by: alain.no.spam 
 Scott Finnie wrote:
 
 > [Apologies if this is answered elsewhere, pointers appreciated if so].
 
 > I'm considering some C++ analysis tools, so require access to parse
 > trees --> am interested in whether the cdt parser will fit the bill.
 
 > For example,
 
 >   . does it parse all c++ (e.g. method bodies as well as declarations,
 >     templates)?
 >   . Is the parse tree structure documented?  If so, where?
 >   . How to access the parse tree?  (e.g. API?)
 >   . any platform limitations?  (e.g. windows-isms not handled?)
 
 At this point, no.
 The C/C++ parser in the CDT is incomplete, the first try
 was/is base on the public one available in JavaCC.
 
 > Many thanks.
 
 >   - Scott.
 |  |  |  | 
Powered by 
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03770 seconds