|
|
|
| Re: Generated EObjectValidator class [message #76390 is a reply to message #76375] |
Thu, 13 November 2008 16:55  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
John,
Comments below.
John T.E. Timm wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Thanks for the response. Do you think that automatically generating a
> validator method for large models that exceeds the 64k limit is a
> scalability issue?
I assume it's the huge switch statement that's a problem, right? It's
obviously a problem based on size which I think is the definition of a
scalability issue.
> Should I submit an enhancement request to automatically break the
> validator function into validator, validator0, validator1, ... etc. if
> it exceeds a certain size?
That's the problem, is how to know when to do that. You can't know how
much byte code is generated.
Keep in mind too, that the EMF wishlist grows rapidly, so even asking is
not likely to produce results. Contributing is the most likely approach
to produce what you need...
To me the real problem is that folks have created obscenely large
unstructured models. If this were done in Java, no one would ever
consider defining 1500 things in one package...
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> John,
>
>> No that's not possible.
>
>
>> John T.E. Timm wrote:
>>> I understand from:
>>>
>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg1 6922.html
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/m92233851.html
>>>
>>> That an EObjectValidator class gets generated when there are
>>> constraints associated with a particular model. What I would like to
>>> do is turn off the production of this Validator regardless of the
>>> model. Is it possible to force EMF to suppress the generation of
>>> this Validator?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Generated EObjectValidator class [message #603482 is a reply to message #76359] |
Thu, 13 November 2008 14:17 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ed,
Thanks for the response. Do you think that automatically generating a
validator method for large models that exceeds the 64k limit is a
scalability issue? Should I submit an enhancement request to automatically
break the validator function into validator, validator0, validator1, ...
etc. if it exceeds a certain size?
Thanks,
John
Ed Merks wrote:
> John,
> No that's not possible.
> John T.E. Timm wrote:
>> I understand from:
>>
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg1 6922.html
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/m92233851.html
>>
>> That an EObjectValidator class gets generated when there are
>> constraints associated with a particular model. What I would like to
>> do is turn off the production of this Validator regardless of the
>> model. Is it possible to force EMF to suppress the generation of this
>> Validator?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
|
|
|
| Re: Generated EObjectValidator class [message #603487 is a reply to message #76375] |
Thu, 13 November 2008 16:55 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
John,
Comments below.
John T.E. Timm wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Thanks for the response. Do you think that automatically generating a
> validator method for large models that exceeds the 64k limit is a
> scalability issue?
I assume it's the huge switch statement that's a problem, right? It's
obviously a problem based on size which I think is the definition of a
scalability issue.
> Should I submit an enhancement request to automatically break the
> validator function into validator, validator0, validator1, ... etc. if
> it exceeds a certain size?
That's the problem, is how to know when to do that. You can't know how
much byte code is generated.
Keep in mind too, that the EMF wishlist grows rapidly, so even asking is
not likely to produce results. Contributing is the most likely approach
to produce what you need...
To me the real problem is that folks have created obscenely large
unstructured models. If this were done in Java, no one would ever
consider defining 1500 things in one package...
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> John,
>
>> No that's not possible.
>
>
>> John T.E. Timm wrote:
>>> I understand from:
>>>
>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg1 6922.html
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/m92233851.html
>>>
>>> That an EObjectValidator class gets generated when there are
>>> constraints associated with a particular model. What I would like to
>>> do is turn off the production of this Validator regardless of the
>>> model. Is it possible to force EMF to suppress the generation of
>>> this Validator?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09922 seconds
Home