| Extending Association with Profile [message #471639] |
Tue, 13 March 2007 22:54  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Firstly, I am using a lightweight extension profile for UML. I wish to
create a n-ary multi-navigable association with endpoints to the same
types, including a stereotype extension to a package. I tried extending
Association first, but this doesn't allow me to associate the endpoint
with a package. I also tried a DirectedRelationship - this would be
perfect but the problem is I can't instantiate it in the UML editor
because it is abstract, so I can't apply a stereotype with it. Does
anyone have any suggestions of any other constructs that may help or
know how to do this?
Thanks,
ac
|
|
|
| Re: Extending Association with Profile [message #471640 is a reply to message #471639] |
Wed, 14 March 2007 09:58  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Andrew,
How about a Dependency? It's tough to say whether using an association in
some cases and other form of directed relationship in others cases makes
more sense than always using a dependency without understanding the problem
you are trying to solve.
Cheers,
- James.
"Andrew Carton" <cartona@cs.tcd.ie> wrote in message
news:et7o4e$hek$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, I am using a lightweight extension profile for UML. I wish to
> create a n-ary multi-navigable association with endpoints to the same
> types, including a stereotype extension to a package. I tried extending
> Association first, but this doesn't allow me to associate the endpoint
> with a package. I also tried a DirectedRelationship - this would be
> perfect but the problem is I can't instantiate it in the UML editor
> because it is abstract, so I can't apply a stereotype with it. Does
> anyone have any suggestions of any other constructs that may help or
> know how to do this?
>
> Thanks,
> ac
|
|
|
| Re: Extending Association with Profile [message #598475 is a reply to message #471639] |
Wed, 14 March 2007 09:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Andrew,
How about a Dependency? It's tough to say whether using an association in
some cases and other form of directed relationship in others cases makes
more sense than always using a dependency without understanding the problem
you are trying to solve.
Cheers,
- James.
"Andrew Carton" <cartona@cs.tcd.ie> wrote in message
news:et7o4e$hek$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, I am using a lightweight extension profile for UML. I wish to
> create a n-ary multi-navigable association with endpoints to the same
> types, including a stereotype extension to a package. I tried extending
> Association first, but this doesn't allow me to associate the endpoint
> with a package. I also tried a DirectedRelationship - this would be
> perfect but the problem is I can't instantiate it in the UML editor
> because it is abstract, so I can't apply a stereotype with it. Does
> anyone have any suggestions of any other constructs that may help or
> know how to do this?
>
> Thanks,
> ac
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07640 seconds
Home