|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #35898 is a reply to message #35864] |
Thu, 15 January 2004 08:21  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: crscca.bol.net.in
Thank Goodness 4 that.
Dave Steinberg wrote:
> Raster wrote:
> > What do you mean by- "we're stretched very thing right now"?
> > I hope eclipse team plans to continue with xsd beyond M5. (No need for me
> > to panic I hope on that count.)
> Hi Raster,
> Sorry, I didn't mean to alarm you. I just meant that the EMF/XSD team isn't
> at full strength right now, due to vacations and to other responsibilities.
> Things should be picking up again in the coming weeks. Yes, we certainly
> intend to continue with XSD well beyond M5.
> Oh, and "thing" was a typo; I meant "thin." :)
> Cheers,
> Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582514 is a reply to message #35452] |
Mon, 12 January 2004 13:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
raster wrote:
> Hi!
>
> OK how does one get the following:-
> use="required"/use="optional"
Hi Raghu,
XSDAttributeUse.getUse() returns an instance of the XSDAttributeUseCategory
enum, with value OPTIONAL_LITERAL, PROHIBITED_LITERAL, or REQUIRED_LITERAL.
XSDAttributeUse represents a use of an attribute (by declaration, by
reference, or via an attribute group). Its role is analogous to XSDParticle.
XSDAttributeUses are generally accessed from an XSDComplexTypeDefinition or
XSDAttributeGroupDefinition via their attributeUses references.
Cheers,
Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582577 is a reply to message #35487] |
Tue, 13 January 2004 08:19 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
We seem to be done with our code's xsd portion. Having some trouble with
the compositors when we are extending complex types. Will sort it out
later.
Have 1 question
1. Does xsd plugin work fine inside M6? So far used it inside M5.
Thanks.
Raster
Dave Steinberg wrote:
> raster wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > OK how does one get the following:-
> > use="required"/use="optional"
> Hi Raghu,
> XSDAttributeUse.getUse() returns an instance of the XSDAttributeUseCategory
> enum, with value OPTIONAL_LITERAL, PROHIBITED_LITERAL, or REQUIRED_LITERAL.
> XSDAttributeUse represents a use of an attribute (by declaration, by
> reference, or via an attribute group). Its role is analogous to XSDParticle.
> XSDAttributeUses are generally accessed from an XSDComplexTypeDefinition or
> XSDAttributeGroupDefinition via their attributeUses references.
> Cheers,
> Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582618 is a reply to message #35594] |
Tue, 13 January 2004 15:14 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Raster wrote:
> Have 1 question
> 1. Does xsd plugin work fine inside M6? So far used it inside M5.
Hi Raster,
EMF doesn't yet work in M6, so XSD doesn't either. You'll have to stick with
M5 until we get it working. Unfortunately, we're stretched very thing right now.
Cheers,
Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582689 is a reply to message #35661] |
Wed, 14 January 2004 01:34 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Dave,
What do you mean by- "we're stretched very thing right now"?
Raster
Dave Steinberg wrote:
> Raster wrote:
> > Have 1 question
> > 1. Does xsd plugin work fine inside M6? So far used it inside M5.
> Hi Raster,
> EMF doesn't yet work in M6, so XSD doesn't either. You'll have to stick with
> M5 until we get it working. Unfortunately, we're stretched very thing right
now.
> Cheers,
> Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582705 is a reply to message #35661] |
Wed, 14 January 2004 01:38 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Dave,
What do you mean by- "we're stretched very thing right now"?
I hope eclipse team plans to continue with xsd beyond M5. (No need for me
to panic I hope on that count.)
Raster
Dave Steinberg wrote:
> Raster wrote:
> > Have 1 question
> > 1. Does xsd plugin work fine inside M6? So far used it inside M5.
> Hi Raster,
> EMF doesn't yet work in M6, so XSD doesn't either. You'll have to stick with
> M5 until we get it working. Unfortunately, we're stretched very thing right
now.
> Cheers,
> Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582728 is a reply to message #35797] |
Wed, 14 January 2004 09:30 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Raster wrote:
> What do you mean by- "we're stretched very thing right now"?
> I hope eclipse team plans to continue with xsd beyond M5. (No need for me
> to panic I hope on that count.)
Hi Raster,
Sorry, I didn't mean to alarm you. I just meant that the EMF/XSD team isn't
at full strength right now, due to vacations and to other responsibilities.
Things should be picking up again in the coming weeks. Yes, we certainly
intend to continue with XSD well beyond M5.
Oh, and "thing" was a typo; I meant "thin." :)
Cheers,
Dave
|
|
|
| Re: use="required"/use="optional" [message #582743 is a reply to message #35864] |
Thu, 15 January 2004 08:21 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thank Goodness 4 that.
Dave Steinberg wrote:
> Raster wrote:
> > What do you mean by- "we're stretched very thing right now"?
> > I hope eclipse team plans to continue with xsd beyond M5. (No need for me
> > to panic I hope on that count.)
> Hi Raster,
> Sorry, I didn't mean to alarm you. I just meant that the EMF/XSD team isn't
> at full strength right now, due to vacations and to other responsibilities.
> Things should be picking up again in the coming weeks. Yes, we certainly
> intend to continue with XSD well beyond M5.
> Oh, and "thing" was a typo; I meant "thin." :)
> Cheers,
> Dave
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.47796 seconds
Home