| Prefuse bundle for Orbit [message #507787] |
Thu, 14 January 2010 11:21  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello guys,
I'm preparing the bundle for Prefuse to deliver it to Orbit project.
And I have a question, what do you think about existing Prefuse namespace: "prefuse", and only this ...
I guess it would be better to have "org.prefuse", like website url, or "org.eclipse.modisco.prefuse" like other
components ? What do you think about that ?
Gabriel
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Prefuse bundle for Orbit [message #507974 is a reply to message #507927] |
Fri, 15 January 2010 06:51  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks, "org.prefuse" adopted !
Hugo Bruneliere wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I agree with Henrik. The name "org.prefuse" will be more consistent with
> the name of the other available Orbit bundles.
>
> Hugo
>
> Henrik Lindberg a écrit :
>> Suggest using URL like name, using the adress of where prefuse project
>> is hosted. (Assuming the package is not modisco specific).
>> - henrik
>> Gabriel <gBarbier@mia-software.com> wrote:
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> I'm preparing the bundle for Prefuse to deliver it to Orbit project.
>>> And I have a question, what do you think about existing Prefuse
>>> namespace: "prefuse", and only this ...
>>>
>>> I guess it would be better to have "org.prefuse", like website url, or
>>> "org.eclipse.modisco.prefuse" like other components ? What do you
>>> think about that ?
>>>
>>> Gabriel
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Prefuse bundle for Orbit [message #574242 is a reply to message #507787] |
Thu, 14 January 2010 13:57 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Suggest using URL like name, using the adress of where prefuse project
is hosted. (Assuming the package is not modisco specific).
- henrik
Gabriel <gBarbier@mia-software.com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm preparing the bundle for Prefuse to deliver it to Orbit project.
> And I have a question, what do you think about existing Prefuse
> namespace: "prefuse", and only this ...
>
> I guess it would be better to have "org.prefuse", like website url, or
> "org.eclipse.modisco.prefuse" like other
> components ? What do you think about that ?
>
> Gabriel
--
- henrik
|
|
|
| Re: Prefuse bundle for Orbit [message #574264 is a reply to message #507821] |
Fri, 15 January 2010 03:55 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I agree with Henrik. The name "org.prefuse" will be more consistent with
the name of the other available Orbit bundles.
Hugo
Henrik Lindberg a écrit :
> Suggest using URL like name, using the adress of where prefuse project
> is hosted. (Assuming the package is not modisco specific).
> - henrik
> Gabriel <gBarbier@mia-software.com> wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I'm preparing the bundle for Prefuse to deliver it to Orbit project.
>> And I have a question, what do you think about existing Prefuse
>> namespace: "prefuse", and only this ...
>>
>> I guess it would be better to have "org.prefuse", like website url, or
>> "org.eclipse.modisco.prefuse" like other
>> components ? What do you think about that ?
>>
>> Gabriel
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------
Hugo Bruneliere - R&D Engineer
AtlanMod research team (INRIA & EMN) - Room B206
Ecole des Mines de Nantes
4, rue Alfred Kastler
44307 Nantes Cedex 3 - France
Office: +33 (0)2 51 85 82 21
EMail: hugo.bruneliere@inria.fr
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
| Re: Prefuse bundle for Orbit [message #574287 is a reply to message #507927] |
Fri, 15 January 2010 06:51 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks, "org.prefuse" adopted !
Hugo Bruneliere wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I agree with Henrik. The name "org.prefuse" will be more consistent with
> the name of the other available Orbit bundles.
>
> Hugo
>
> Henrik Lindberg a écrit :
>> Suggest using URL like name, using the adress of where prefuse project
>> is hosted. (Assuming the package is not modisco specific).
>> - henrik
>> Gabriel <gBarbier@mia-software.com> wrote:
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> I'm preparing the bundle for Prefuse to deliver it to Orbit project.
>>> And I have a question, what do you think about existing Prefuse
>>> namespace: "prefuse", and only this ...
>>>
>>> I guess it would be better to have "org.prefuse", like website url, or
>>> "org.eclipse.modisco.prefuse" like other components ? What do you
>>> think about that ?
>>>
>>> Gabriel
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.27801 seconds
Home