|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Genuitech bug fixes to IBM contribution are available on the website [message #49226 is a reply to message #49214] |
Fri, 15 October 2004 16:08   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bobrivers.pobox.com
Hi,
Same to me. The ibm-genuitec zip file is a bunch of classes without any
meaning.
I have tryed to install it into a fresh eclipse instalation, but nothing
happens. I also tryed to put it as a plugin, feature, plugin + feature,
etc...
Roberto
Brazil
"SJG" <sgeertgens@fnni.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:ckokco$h9r$1@eclipse.org...
> Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
>
> > Thanks to the Genuitech crew for spending time fixing things in the IBM
code
> > contribution. As per the EPL, their fixed code is available on the WTP
> > website (see http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/main.html at
the
> > bottom).
> > Thanks for the contribution of time and effort - we appreciate it!
>
>
> This is great and all, but how do we use it? The plugin folders are all
> named differently, so it isn't a drop-in replacement to the IBM tools.
> However, it doesn't seem to work standalone either and dropping it in in
> place of the IBM tools just leaves things largely non-functioning. Any
> readmes/changelogs/help anywhere?
>
|
|
|
|
Re: Genuitech bug fixes to IBM contribution are available on the website [message #50074 is a reply to message #49226] |
Thu, 21 October 2004 03:59   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Is there someone that success to use this plugin with fixes?
Is there some list of fixes that are implemented?
Roberto wrote:
> Hi,
> Same to me. The ibm-genuitec zip file is a bunch of classes without any
> meaning.
> I have tryed to install it into a fresh eclipse instalation, but nothing
> happens. I also tryed to put it as a plugin, feature, plugin + feature,
> etc...
> Roberto
> Brazil
> "SJG" <sgeertgens@fnni.com> escreveu na mensagem
> news:ckokco$h9r$1@eclipse.org...
> > Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks to the Genuitech crew for spending time fixing things in the IBM
> code
> > > contribution. As per the EPL, their fixed code is available on the WTP
> > > website (see http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/main.html at
> the
> > > bottom).
> > > Thanks for the contribution of time and effort - we appreciate it!
> >
> >
> > This is great and all, but how do we use it? The plugin folders are all
> > named differently, so it isn't a drop-in replacement to the IBM tools.
> > However, it doesn't seem to work standalone either and dropping it in in
> > place of the IBM tools just leaves things largely non-functioning. Any
> > readmes/changelogs/help anywhere?
> >
|
|
|
Re: Genuitech bug fixes to IBM contribution are available on the website [message #50104 is a reply to message #49226] |
Thu, 21 October 2004 04:27   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: no_mail.here.com
could someone please tell us what to do with these fix collection?
"Roberto" <bobrivers@pobox.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:ckpae5$sru$1@eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Same to me. The ibm-genuitec zip file is a bunch of classes without any
> meaning.
>
> I have tryed to install it into a fresh eclipse instalation, but nothing
> happens. I also tryed to put it as a plugin, feature, plugin + feature,
> etc...
>
> Roberto
> Brazil
>
>
> "SJG" <sgeertgens@fnni.com> escreveu na mensagem
> news:ckokco$h9r$1@eclipse.org...
> > Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks to the Genuitech crew for spending time fixing things in the
IBM
> code
> > > contribution. As per the EPL, their fixed code is available on the WTP
> > > website (see http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/main.html at
> the
> > > bottom).
> > > Thanks for the contribution of time and effort - we appreciate it!
> >
> >
> > This is great and all, but how do we use it? The plugin folders are
all
> > named differently, so it isn't a drop-in replacement to the IBM tools.
> > However, it doesn't seem to work standalone either and dropping it in in
> > place of the IBM tools just leaves things largely non-functioning. Any
> > readmes/changelogs/help anywhere?
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04064 seconds