| model reviews - as attachements? [message #486623] |
Fri, 18 September 2009 09:07  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
the attachment works when getting the news via a newsreader. The forum
client however decided to show it in encoded text form (!!!).
So, any proposals how to review progress made on models?
I will have the models checked in, and I could also check in the .pdf
files and just post URLs to them.
How/Where would you like to review models?
- attachments to posts in this newsgroup
- links to PDF files in SVN
- Checkout the diagrams from SVN (to also see all details, comments, etc.)
Regards
- henrik
|
|
|
|
| Re: model reviews - as attachements? [message #486674 is a reply to message #486652] |
Fri, 18 September 2009 11:01  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Bugzilla would perhaps be a better alternative - with model revisions as
attachments. I.e. the same way as patches are discussed. We don't have
an entry in bugzilla yet though.
And yes, models will be in SVN so anyone can "muck about" :)
- henrik
Oisin Hurley wrote:
> Henrik Lindberg wrote on Fri, 18 September 2009 09:07
>> How/Where would you like to review models?
>> - attachments to posts in this newsgroup
>> - links to PDF files in SVN
>> - Checkout the diagrams from SVN (to also see all details, comments,
>> etc.)
>
>
> As long as it is straightforward to know what version of the document
> has what comments, then that would work.
>
> You could put the PDF into SVN, and we could refer to the rev number for
> comments in this forum.
> When the documents change, the check-in comment should link to the
> pertinent discussions in the forum, and those discussions
> should be terminated with a post containing a message like
>
> "This discussion has been addressed in r2133"
> The models will be SVN for mucking about with too, right?
>
> cheers
> --oh
|
|
|
| Re: model reviews - as attachements? [message #571411 is a reply to message #486623] |
Fri, 18 September 2009 10:17 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Henrik Lindberg wrote on Fri, 18 September 2009 09:07
> How/Where would you like to review models?
> - attachments to posts in this newsgroup
> - links to PDF files in SVN
> - Checkout the diagrams from SVN (to also see all details, comments, etc.)
As long as it is straightforward to know what version of the
document has what comments, then that would work.
You could put the PDF into SVN, and we could refer to the
rev number for comments in this forum.
When the documents change, the check-in comment should
link to the pertinent discussions in the forum, and those discussions
should be terminated with a post containing a message like
"This discussion has been addressed in r2133"
The models will be SVN for mucking about with too, right?
cheers
--oh
|
|
|
| Re: model reviews - as attachements? [message #571520 is a reply to message #571411] |
Fri, 18 September 2009 11:01 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Bugzilla would perhaps be a better alternative - with model revisions as
attachments. I.e. the same way as patches are discussed. We don't have
an entry in bugzilla yet though.
And yes, models will be in SVN so anyone can "muck about" :)
- henrik
Oisin Hurley wrote:
> Henrik Lindberg wrote on Fri, 18 September 2009 09:07
>> How/Where would you like to review models?
>> - attachments to posts in this newsgroup
>> - links to PDF files in SVN
>> - Checkout the diagrams from SVN (to also see all details, comments,
>> etc.)
>
>
> As long as it is straightforward to know what version of the document
> has what comments, then that would work.
>
> You could put the PDF into SVN, and we could refer to the rev number for
> comments in this forum.
> When the documents change, the check-in comment should link to the
> pertinent discussions in the forum, and those discussions
> should be terminated with a post containing a message like
>
> "This discussion has been addressed in r2133"
> The models will be SVN for mucking about with too, right?
>
> cheers
> --oh
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05199 seconds
Home