|
| Re: EMF and UML versions compatibility in standalone application [message #478534 is a reply to message #478525] |
Mon, 22 June 2009 14:23  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Martynas,
Mixing and matching UML2 and EMF versions is not a good idea in general.
UML2 has very strict version range restrictions on dependencies in EMF. In
your particular case, I think you may be safe since I don't believe that
UML2 makes use of incompatible API but you would have to test this out to
make certain.
Cheers,
- James.
"Martynas Lelevicius" <marte@nomagic.com> wrote in message
news:h1fiov$7vn$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use the older UML version with newer EMF version?
> E.g. UML 2.0.4 with EMF 2.4.2 (UML 2.0.4 was built with EMF 2.2.3)
>
> Thanks,
> Martynas
|
|
|
| Re: EMF and UML versions compatibility in standalone application [message #627713 is a reply to message #478525] |
Mon, 22 June 2009 14:23 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Martynas,
Mixing and matching UML2 and EMF versions is not a good idea in general.
UML2 has very strict version range restrictions on dependencies in EMF. In
your particular case, I think you may be safe since I don't believe that
UML2 makes use of incompatible API but you would have to test this out to
make certain.
Cheers,
- James.
"Martynas Lelevicius" <marte@nomagic.com> wrote in message
news:h1fiov$7vn$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use the older UML version with newer EMF version?
> E.g. UML 2.0.4 with EMF 2.4.2 (UML 2.0.4 was built with EMF 2.2.3)
>
> Thanks,
> Martynas
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03047 seconds
Home