Home » Modeling » UML2 » Re: provide a model with a plugin
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #477393] |
Sat, 17 May 2008 10:56  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ed Merks wrote:
> Felix,
>
> In EcoreResourceFactoryImpl.createResource we use
>
> result.getDefaultSaveOptions().put(XMLResource.OPTION_URI_HA NDLER,
> new URIHandlerImpl.PlatformSchemeAware());
>
> to avoid having a relative path from workspace resources to plugin
> resources.
I see. Maybe the UML2 project developers could be very nice and set those
options in UMLResourceFactoryImpl too?
Felix
|
|
| | | |
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #477409 is a reply to message #477407] |
Tue, 20 May 2008 13:20  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Ken,
> We'll need to look at this in a future release, as it's too late to get it
> into UML2 2.2.
Note that EMF is doing so for their Ecore editor. I'd just guess it's safe to
follow them. Also, it's not even a one-liner, but you may have other stuff to do
so thanks anyway for pickin it up.
> Note that, since it's an option, the client can always
> specify it before saving the model as a work-around.
Not if the client uses the UML2 tree editor provided with the UML2 Plugin, and
I'd guess UML2Tools does use the default options too. Maybe I give this editor
too much weight, but for me it currently is the tool of choice to create my uml
models (thank god I can rely on small test models.)
Thanks,
Felix
|
|
|
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #477418 is a reply to message #477409] |
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Felix,
It's not about the amount of work to make the change, but about where we are
in the release cycle - we're in release candidate mode now, which means only
major bugs can be resolved at this point...
Kenn
"Felix Dorner" <felix_do@web.de> wrote in message
news:g0v18n$hv0$1@build.eclipse.org...
>
> Hi Ken,
>
>> We'll need to look at this in a future release, as it's too late to get
>> it into UML2 2.2.
>
> Note that EMF is doing so for their Ecore editor. I'd just guess it's safe
> to follow them. Also, it's not even a one-liner, but you may have other
> stuff to do so thanks anyway for pickin it up.
>
>> Note that, since it's an option, the client can always specify it before
>> saving the model as a work-around.
>
> Not if the client uses the UML2 tree editor provided with the UML2 Plugin,
> and I'd guess UML2Tools does use the default options too. Maybe I give
> this editor too much weight, but for me it currently is the tool of choice
> to create my uml models (thank god I can rely on small test models.)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #477421 is a reply to message #477418] |
Wed, 21 May 2008 12:29 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hey Kenn,
I assumed something like this. Unfortunately I never worked on big projects and
am not familiar with how everything is scheduled. I guess I could learn
something from it.
Thanks again,
Felix
Kenn Hussey wrote:
> Felix,
>
> It's not about the amount of work to make the change, but about where we are
> in the release cycle - we're in release candidate mode now, which means only
> major bugs can be resolved at this point...
|
|
|
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #626576 is a reply to message #477393] |
Sat, 17 May 2008 11:01 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Felix,
I'd suggest opening a bugzilla for that.
Felix Dorner wrote:
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Felix,
>>
>> In EcoreResourceFactoryImpl.createResource we use
>>
>> result.getDefaultSaveOptions().put(XMLResource.OPTION_URI_HA NDLER,
>> new URIHandlerImpl.PlatformSchemeAware());
>>
>> to avoid having a relative path from workspace resources to plugin
>> resources.
>
> I see. Maybe the UML2 project developers could be very nice and set
> those options in UMLResourceFactoryImpl too?
>
> Felix
|
|
| | |
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #626591 is a reply to message #477407] |
Tue, 20 May 2008 13:20 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Ken,
> We'll need to look at this in a future release, as it's too late to get it
> into UML2 2.2.
Note that EMF is doing so for their Ecore editor. I'd just guess it's safe to
follow them. Also, it's not even a one-liner, but you may have other stuff to do
so thanks anyway for pickin it up.
> Note that, since it's an option, the client can always
> specify it before saving the model as a work-around.
Not if the client uses the UML2 tree editor provided with the UML2 Plugin, and
I'd guess UML2Tools does use the default options too. Maybe I give this editor
too much weight, but for me it currently is the tool of choice to create my uml
models (thank god I can rely on small test models.)
Thanks,
Felix
|
|
|
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #626600 is a reply to message #477409] |
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Felix,
It's not about the amount of work to make the change, but about where we are
in the release cycle - we're in release candidate mode now, which means only
major bugs can be resolved at this point...
Kenn
"Felix Dorner" <felix_do@web.de> wrote in message
news:g0v18n$hv0$1@build.eclipse.org...
>
> Hi Ken,
>
>> We'll need to look at this in a future release, as it's too late to get
>> it into UML2 2.2.
>
> Note that EMF is doing so for their Ecore editor. I'd just guess it's safe
> to follow them. Also, it's not even a one-liner, but you may have other
> stuff to do so thanks anyway for pickin it up.
>
>> Note that, since it's an option, the client can always specify it before
>> saving the model as a work-around.
>
> Not if the client uses the UML2 tree editor provided with the UML2 Plugin,
> and I'd guess UML2Tools does use the default options too. Maybe I give
> this editor too much weight, but for me it currently is the tool of choice
> to create my uml models (thank god I can rely on small test models.)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: provide a model with a plugin [message #626603 is a reply to message #477418] |
Wed, 21 May 2008 12:29 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hey Kenn,
I assumed something like this. Unfortunately I never worked on big projects and
am not familiar with how everything is scheduled. I guess I could learn
something from it.
Thanks again,
Felix
Kenn Hussey wrote:
> Felix,
>
> It's not about the amount of work to make the change, but about where we are
> in the release cycle - we're in release candidate mode now, which means only
> major bugs can be resolved at this point...
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Aug 31 14:56:33 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03593 seconds |
Home