| How to model an operation with concrete instanceSpecifications as inputs and output? [message #477163] |
Mon, 31 March 2008 05:39  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: reichwein.isd.uni-stuttgart.de
Hello,
I would like to specify in UML that an instanceSpecification is the
result from an operation invocation. I also need to specify the
instanceSpecifications that correspond to the parameters of the invoked
operation. I did not find in the specification UML elements to model
this information. Did I miss something? Do I need to use stereotypes to
model this information? I do not want to model an interaction but just
the fact that an instance is the result of an operation invocation with
specific instances as parameters, a sort of "operation instance" with
concrete instances as inputs and output.
Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Axel
|
|
|
| Re: How to model an operation with concrete instanceSpecifications as inputs and output? [message #477199 is a reply to message #477163] |
Fri, 04 April 2008 10:59  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Axel,
I think what you might be interested in is the ValueSpecification which is
the result of an operation being called. You can model this with
uml::Message:argument or the return message. You might want to create a
sequence diagram to model what you are trying to express.
You do not need stereotypes to model this.
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
- James.
"Axel Reichwein" <reichwein@isd.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote in message
news:fsqbh5$e73$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> I would like to specify in UML that an instanceSpecification is the result
> from an operation invocation. I also need to specify the
> instanceSpecifications that correspond to the parameters of the invoked
> operation. I did not find in the specification UML elements to model this
> information. Did I miss something? Do I need to use stereotypes to model
> this information? I do not want to model an interaction but just the fact
> that an instance is the result of an operation invocation with specific
> instances as parameters, a sort of "operation instance" with concrete
> instances as inputs and output.
>
> Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Axel
|
|
|
| Re: How to model an operation with concrete instanceSpecifications as inputs and output? [message #626356 is a reply to message #477163] |
Fri, 04 April 2008 10:59 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Axel,
I think what you might be interested in is the ValueSpecification which is
the result of an operation being called. You can model this with
uml::Message:argument or the return message. You might want to create a
sequence diagram to model what you are trying to express.
You do not need stereotypes to model this.
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
- James.
"Axel Reichwein" <reichwein@isd.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote in message
news:fsqbh5$e73$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> I would like to specify in UML that an instanceSpecification is the result
> from an operation invocation. I also need to specify the
> instanceSpecifications that correspond to the parameters of the invoked
> operation. I did not find in the specification UML elements to model this
> information. Did I miss something? Do I need to use stereotypes to model
> this information? I do not want to model an interaction but just the fact
> that an instance is the result of an operation invocation with specific
> instances as parameters, a sort of "operation instance" with concrete
> instances as inputs and output.
>
> Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Axel
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02933 seconds
Home