| No viable solution [message #469336] |
Thu, 20 November 2008 04:10  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I stumbled across your site and noticed your statement that there "is no
viable solution to have a single source policy for both platforms".
This is not quite true.
We at CtoJ offer exactly this as a service to our customers. Eventhough
our service isn't an open-source approach your statement is misleading.
Our background is currently focused on the C++ to Java translation, but we
also offer further services like the one you are describing.
I guess you should re-phrase your proposal to "there is no open-source
solution to have a single source policy".
Kind regards,
Rafael Otero
Http://www.CtoJ.de
|
|
|
| Re: No viable solution [message #469345 is a reply to message #469336] |
Fri, 21 November 2008 07:29  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Rafael,
My statement was : There is no way to have only Java source code and
auto-magically run *at no cost* (performance, user modification, ...) the
code in .NET.
But your are right, my concern is open-source.
I have a question for you : I saw on your website that you (will?) have a
c++ to c# generator. Do you plan to have something from java to C# ?
Thanks fro your interset.
@lex
|
|
|
| Re: No viable solution [message #566567 is a reply to message #469336] |
Fri, 21 November 2008 07:29 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Rafael,
My statement was : There is no way to have only Java source code and
auto-magically run *at no cost* (performance, user modification, ...) the
code in .NET.
But your are right, my concern is open-source.
I have a question for you : I saw on your website that you (will?) have a
c++ to c# generator. Do you plan to have something from java to C# ?
Thanks fro your interset.
@lex
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04007 seconds
Home