|
|
|
| Re: Option for public constructor [message #408869 is a reply to message #408865] |
Fri, 27 April 2007 12:32  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060906050006070901030106
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Pradeep,
It's certainly trivial to add such an option to the generator, so open a
bugzilla feature request and we'll consider it.
Pradeep wrote:
> Well, I am writing a library for others to use. As I update the existing
> code using EMF, i don't want any previous code that uses this library, which
> often uses the public constructor, to break. Also I want to provide a most
> familiar way of creating objects.
>
> Thanks
> Pradeep
>
>
> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:f0sjhe$q9p$2@build.eclipse.org...
>
>> Pradeep,
>>
>> No. But I suppose adding that would be quite trivial to support. It's
>> also possible to copy the template, modify it to be public, and use
>> dynamic templates to generate what you want. I wonder why you would want
>> it public?
>>
>>
>> Pradeep wrote:
>>
>>> Is there an option to set in the genmodel so that the generated
>>> constructors are public instead of protected?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Pradeep
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
--------------060906050006070901030106
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Pradeep,<br>
<br>
It's certainly trivial to add such an option to the generator, so open
a bugzilla feature request and we'll consider it.<br>
<br>
<br>
Pradeep wrote:
<blockquote cite="midf0t3qi$9at$1@build.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Well, I am writing a library for others to use. As I update the existing
code using EMF, i don't want any previous code that uses this library, which
often uses the public constructor, to break. Also I want to provide a most
familiar way of creating objects.
Thanks
Pradeep
"Ed Merks" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com"><merks@ca.ibm.com></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:f0sjhe$q9p$2@build.eclipse.org">news:f0sjhe$q9p$2@build.eclipse.org</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Pradeep,
No. But I suppose adding that would be quite trivial to support. It's
also possible to copy the template, modify it to be public, and use
dynamic templates to generate what you want. I wonder why you would want
it public?
Pradeep wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Is there an option to set in the genmodel so that the generated
constructors are public instead of protected?
Thanks
Pradeep
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------060906050006070901030106--
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03551 seconds
Home