| Watch variables while remotely debugging [message #315324] |
Tue, 08 May 2007 14:24  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: albox.free.fr
Hi,
I use the remote debugger to debug a java application for which I have
only a part of the source code. The remote application use the JPDA
transport, allowing Eclipse to debug it.
The trouble is that I'm not able to watch the variables using the
Expressions panel. Here is the message I get (right click on the
variable, then "Inspect" or "Select") :
VariableName cannot be resolved
Evaluations must contain either an expression or a block of well-formed
statements
I'm able to view the some of the variables (this and function arguments)
using the Variables panel but I don't know how to watch the local
variables inside a function...
Does anybody know what could be wrong ?
Thanks,
Al
|
|
|
| Re: Watch variables while remotely debugging [message #315409 is a reply to message #315324] |
Wed, 09 May 2007 11:53  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
There have been some recent fixes in this area (3.3RC1). If you're using 1.5
code/expressions, these problems may be fixed. Otherwise, you should file a
new bug with a reproduceable test case.
for example, @see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=184862
Thanks,
Darin Wright
"al" <albox@free.fr> wrote in message news:f1qf96$tjf$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
> I use the remote debugger to debug a java application for which I have
> only a part of the source code. The remote application use the JPDA
> transport, allowing Eclipse to debug it.
> The trouble is that I'm not able to watch the variables using the
> Expressions panel. Here is the message I get (right click on the variable,
> then "Inspect" or "Select") :
> VariableName cannot be resolved Evaluations must contain either an
> expression or a block of well-formed statements
>
> I'm able to view the some of the variables (this and function arguments)
> using the Variables panel but I don't know how to watch the local
> variables inside a function...
>
> Does anybody know what could be wrong ?
>
> Thanks,
> Al
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.25281 seconds