| Trying to update but getting weird dependence error [message #269004] |
Thu, 05 March 2009 01:05  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
I am trying to install some SDK components to my Eclipse application using
Help->Software Updates, but when I select those packages, I get a
dependence error stating:
"TPTP Platform Trace (4.3.200.v200709030100-7E7ADs2hE77a7S9M8G87) requires
plug-in "org.eclipse.pde.core". "
I googled for org.eclipse.pde.core but I saw nothing that told me how to
obtain that.
Any hints on this?
Thanks,
Rodrigo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Trying to update but getting weird dependence error [message #269055 is a reply to message #269046] |
Thu, 05 March 2009 17:46  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Walter Harley wrote:
> The org.eclipse.pde.core plug-in should come from the "Eclipse PDE Plug-In
> Developer Resources" feature, which would come preinstalled with the Eclipse
> Classic or SDK packages but probably not with Eclipse for Java. Make sure
> you've got PDE installed and then see if your TPTP install works.
Thanks. When I select "Eclipse PDE Plug-In Developer Resources" under
"Eclipse 3.3.2", I get the same error as described before. When I click on
"Error Details", I see that there is a second line too:
"The current configuration contains errors and this operation can have
unpredictable results.
TPTP Platform Trace (4.3.200.v200709030100-7E7ADs2hE77a7S9M8G87)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.pde.core".
Managed Agent Explorer (4.4.2.v200802070100-7E7D8f2hE77c7E7Z7A77)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.emf".
So I included EMF too, but after doing that, I get even more errors:
The current configuration contains errors and this operation can have
unpredictable results.
TPTP Platform Trace (4.3.200.v200709030100-7E7ADs2hE77a7S9M8G87)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.pde.core".
Managed Agent Explorer (4.4.2.v200802070100-7E7D8f2hE77c7E7Z7A77)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.emf".
Current configuration contains errors that are not corrected by the
requested operation and more errors would be introduced. See details for
more information.
----- Current configuration problems -----
TPTP Platform Trace (4.3.200.v200709030100-7E7ADs2hE77a7S9M8G87)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.pde.core".
Managed Agent Explorer (4.4.2.v200802070100-7E7D8f2hE77c7E7Z7A77)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.emf".
----- Configuration problems after the operation -----
TPTP Platform Trace (4.3.200.v200709030100-7E7ADs2hE77a7S9M8G87)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.pde.core".
EMF Model Query Examples (1.2.0.v200805130238-477-_kE77c7QAI7EIc)
requires plug-in "org.eclipse.ocl.ecore (1.1.0)", or compatible.
EMF Model Query OCL Integration
(1.2.0.v200805130238-11-7w311916241349) requires plug-in
"org.eclipse.emf.ocl (1.1.0)", or compatible.
EMF Validation Framework OCL Integration
(1.2.0.v200805130238-11-7w311916241349) requires plug-in
"org.eclipse.emf.ocl (1.0.0)", or compatible.
EMF Validation Framework Examples
(1.2.0.v200805130238-579-AgI99m9XFU_OHh) requires plug-in
"org.eclipse.ocl.ecore (1.1.0)", or compatible.
I searched the web trying to find where OCL would be, but didn't manage to.
I am starting to think that it will be easier to install a newer and more
complete version of Eclipse. I suppose "Eclipse Classic" will have all I
need, right? I am trying to get and use JFace.
Thanks,
Rodrigo
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Trying to update but getting weird dependence error [message #269061 is a reply to message #269059] |
Thu, 05 March 2009 21:10 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Walter Harley wrote:
> "Eric Rizzo" <eclipse-news@rizzoweb.com> wrote in message
> news:gopmnl$8na$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> On 3/5/2009 5:46 PM, Rodrigo de Salvo Braz wrote:
>>> I am starting to think that it will be easier to install a newer and
>>> more complete version of Eclipse. I suppose "Eclipse Classic" will have
>>> all I need, right? I am trying to get and use JFace.
>>
>> Are you going to use JFace in the context of a plugin or RCP? If so, you
>> should get the Eclipse for Plug-in/RCP Developers package. Even if you're
>> going to use JFace standalone, it is still nice to have the PDE and all
>> the source code for the platform and JDT to use as examples.
>> So either way I recommend getting the Plug-ins/RCP developers packages.
> As usual, I agree with Eric.
> Also, as long you are going to install from scratch, you might consider
> upgrading to Eclipse 3.4.
Thank you, I am doing all that. (I am interested in JFace for standalone
use.)
<five minutes later>:
After selecting the packages mentioned above, I get the following:
Cannot complete the request. See the details.
Cannot complete the request. See the details.
Eclipse PDE Plug-in Developer Resources is already installed, so an
update will be performed instead.
Eclipse Plug-in Development Environment is already installed, so an
update will be performed instead.
Eclipse RCP is already installed, so an update will be performed instead.
Eclipse RCP Plug-in Developer Resources is already installed, so an
update will be performed instead.
Cannot find a solution satisfying the following requirements
Match[requiredCapability:
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.iu/org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/[ 3.4.2.r342_v20081028-0800,3.4.2.r342_v20081028-0800]].
So it looks like I already have everything I need but cannot make updates.
That last line sounds like it needs some component of Equinox. I selected
all Equinox components I found (not knowing which one would contain that)
but that didn't change:
Cannot complete the request. See the details.
Cannot complete the request. See the details.
Eclipse PDE Plug-in Developer Resources is already installed, so an
update will be performed instead.
Eclipse Plug-in Development Environment is already installed, so an
update will be performed instead.
Eclipse RCP is already installed, so an update will be performed instead.
Eclipse RCP Plug-in Developer Resources is already installed, so an
update will be performed instead.
Cannot find a solution satisfying the following requirements
Match[requiredCapability:
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.iu/org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/[ 3.4.2.r342_v20081028-0800,3.4.2.r342_v20081028-0800]].
So it looks like I can move on with JFace but it would still be nice to
understand what is going on with those problems. Any hints?
Thanks,
Rodrigo
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 3.53474 seconds
Home